Following a significant cyberattack that breached personal data and disrupted online sales, hundreds of Scottish customers have initiated a class action lawsuit against Marks & Spencer, while the retailer faces major financial losses and scrutiny over its cybersecurity practices.
Hundreds of Scottish customers have initiated a class action lawsuit against Marks & Spencer (M&S) following a significant cyberattack that compromised personal data and disrupted online services. This legal action, spearheaded by Thompsons Solicitors, is a response to M&S's failure to safeguard sensitive information, which may include telephone numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, and online ordering histories of millions of customers. The announcement of this lawsuit came after the Sunday Mail unveiled the breach, prompting widespread concern among affected individuals.
Following the cyber incident, M&S has paused all online and app orders, leading to empty shelves in some branches and estimated losses of up to £3.5 million per day. The attack, which occurred in April, has notably impaired M&S's online clothing sales for over three weeks, causing industry experts to estimate potential compensation claims in the UK could exceed £100 million. Patrick McGuire, a senior partner at Thompsons Solicitors, stated, “Since The Sunday Mail highlighted the launch of our class action against Marks and Spencer, we have been contacted by many more additional Scottish victims of the data theft.” He stressed the seriousness of the crime and M&S's responsibility to protect its customers.
The ramifications of this incident extend far beyond immediate financial losses; the total bill from the cyber breach is estimated at £300 million, with M&S's market value significantly impacted. The retailer’s shares have plummeted by 13% since the attack, resulting in a loss of over £750 million in market capitalisation. Despite these setbacks, in-store sales have remained stable, offering a glimmer of resilience amidst the turmoil. Nonetheless, the incident has raised vital questions regarding data security protocols and the reliance on third-party providers.
The cyberattack underscores a troubling trend of increasing cybercrime within the retail sector, heightened by the complexity of third-party contractor access to corporate systems. Evidence suggests that the hacking group Scattered Spider exploited this vulnerability, leveraging a contractor's access to penetrate M&S's IT networks. This incident has sparked wider scrutiny not only on M&S but on the broader landscape of IT security across multinational retailers, as similar attacks have been reported against companies like Co-op and Harrods.
In the wake of the attack, M&S's pledge to restore e-commerce operations by July remains uncertain. The company is currently in the process of cleaning its IT systems, involving a thorough review of more than 600 applications and thousands of servers. M&S's CEO Stuart Machin described the breach as “the most difficult challenge faced by his team,” committing to a controlled recovery. However, the incident has spurred fears about vulnerability to future scams; many newly affected customers have already reported scam attempts, further complicating the fallout from the breach.
Going forward, M&S is likely to face increasing scrutiny regarding its cyber insurance protocols. The company is set to claim up to £100 million from its insurance policies, a necessary lifeline considering the substantial lost revenues and persisting operational disruptions. Yet, as M&S navigates the aftermath of this crisis, the potential for increased insurance premiums looms large unless significant improvements are made in cyber risk management.
Ultimately, this episode not only showcases the vulnerabilities present in retail cybersecurity frameworks but also serves as a cautionary tale about the necessity of robust data protection strategies. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, companies like M&S must prioritise safeguarding customer information to prevent such breaches from recurring, ensuring that consumer trust is maintained in an increasingly digital marketplace.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative reports on a class action lawsuit initiated by Scottish customers against Marks & Spencer (M&S) following a cyberattack. The earliest known publication date of similar content is April 25, 2025, when M&S paused online orders due to a cyberattack. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/25/marks-and-spencer-pauses-online-orders-cyber-attack-fallout?utm_source=openai)) The class action lawsuit is a recent development, indicating a high freshness score. However, the report's reliance on a press release from Thompsons Solicitors suggests that the information may be recycled, as press releases are often disseminated to multiple outlets. Additionally, the report mentions that the Sunday Mail unveiled the breach, but no specific date is provided, making it difficult to assess the freshness of that information. The absence of specific dates for the Sunday Mail's report and the class action announcement limits the ability to fully evaluate the freshness of the content. The lack of specific dates for the Sunday Mail's report and the class action announcement limits the ability to fully evaluate the freshness of the content. The reliance on a press release and the absence of specific dates for key events suggest that the content may be recycled. The lack of specific dates for the Sunday Mail's report and the class action announcement limits the ability to fully evaluate the freshness of the content.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The report includes a direct quote from Patrick McGuire, a senior partner at Thompsons Solicitors, stating, “Since The Sunday Mail highlighted the launch of our class action against Marks and Spencer, we have been contacted by many more additional Scottish victims of the data theft.” A search for this exact quote reveals no earlier usage, suggesting it may be original or exclusive content. However, without access to the Sunday Mail's report, it's challenging to verify the context and accuracy of the quote. The absence of earlier appearances of the quote supports a higher originality score, but the lack of context raises questions about its authenticity.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Record, a Scottish newspaper. While it is a known publication, its reputation and reliability are not as established as some other outlets. The report cites a press release from Thompsons Solicitors, a law firm, which is a reputable source. However, the reliance on a press release suggests that the information may be disseminated to multiple outlets, potentially reducing the originality of the content. The absence of direct quotes from M&S or independent verification of the class action announcement raises concerns about the report's reliability.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative describes a class action lawsuit initiated by Scottish customers against M&S following a cyberattack. The cyberattack and subsequent disruptions to M&S's online services are well-documented, with reports from April 2025 detailing the incident. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/25/marks-and-spencer-pauses-online-orders-cyber-attack-fallout?utm_source=openai)) The involvement of Thompsons Solicitors in the class action is plausible, as they are a known law firm in Scotland. However, the lack of specific details about the class action, such as the number of plaintiffs or the exact nature of the claims, makes it difficult to fully assess the plausibility of the narrative.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative reports on a class action lawsuit initiated by Scottish customers against Marks & Spencer following a cyberattack. While the cyberattack and subsequent disruptions are well-documented, the reliance on a press release from Thompsons Solicitors and the absence of specific dates for key events raise concerns about the freshness and originality of the content. The lack of direct quotes from M&S or independent verification of the class action announcement further diminishes the reliability of the report. The plausibility of the events described is supported by existing reports, but the lack of specific details about the class action makes it difficult to fully assess the narrative's credibility.