The Duchess of Sussex halts sales of her fledgling lifestyle brand As Ever to reassess its direction, sparking speculation over artificial scarcity and a pivot towards hospitality products. This move highlights the challenges Meghan faces in balancing royal heritage with commercial independence.
Amidst the swirling chaos surrounding her lifestyle brand, As Ever, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, has taken a significant step back, surprising many with her decision to halt sales until next year. Since its launch last month, As Ever has experienced a surge of initial success—products like wildflower honey and edible flower sprinkles sold out in mere moments. However, as consumer excitement quickly metamorphosed into frustration, reports confirm that nearly two months later, items are still marked 'sold out’.
This puzzling retail strategy has led to speculation that Markle might be employing the classic marketing tactic of creating artificial scarcity to inflate perceived demand. Yet, as the weeks drag on with no restocks in sight, some critics point to a more chaotic underbelly to the brand’s operations. In a recent interview with Fast Company, the Duchess asserted her desire to take a moment to gather feedback and insights from the initial launch before deciding on what direction As Ever will take. She stated, "The easiest thing to do would have been to simply restock the products... but I want to really focus on the hospitality angle of As Ever." However, this has left some potential customers bewildered about the brand's future offerings, which could shift towards hospitality items such as tableware and cookbooks.
The evolution of As Ever itself has also been anything but smooth. Originally launched as ‘American Riviera Orchard’, Markle was compelled to make the abrupt name change after her trademark application was rejected on geolocation grounds. While she later distanced herself from the old brand name, labelling it a ‘word salad’, this transition hints at the ongoing struggle for identity and concept clarity within the company.
This latest development plays into a broader narrative about the unconventional trajectory of Meghan and Prince Harry since stepping back from royal duties. There are suggestions that the couple's commercial ventures, especially As Ever, echo existing royal traditions—King Charles III’s own luxurious, sustainable product line, for instance. Both brands offer premium goods aimed at a discerning consumer base, blurring the lines between royal heritage and commercial independence.
Moreover, Harry's recent ventures, such as his surprise trip to China to promote sustainable tourism through his initiative Travalyst, suggest that he too is carving out new business connections as a complement to Meghan’s lifestyle aspirations. This development may not just be a sibling's supportive act, but rather a strategic means of maintaining influence and financial stability in a highly competitive market.
As the Sussexes navigate these turbulent waters, Markle's I-want-to-do-it-my-way attitude appears to resonate with both admirers and detractors alike. While some view her as a powerful figure embracing her independence, others interpret these moves as overly optimistic or even naïve in the face of stiff market realities. With Netflix entwined in this venture through a lifestyle series featuring the Duchess, the stakes are higher than ever. Observers are left questioning not only the viability of As Ever but also the very future of the couple's joint business pursuits.
The ongoing saga of As Ever raises pertinent questions about the challenges of brand management in the public eye, especially for those trying to step out of the long shadow cast by royal associations. With a landscape rife with expectations—both of success and failure—one wonders whether Meghan Markle can adeptly pivot from this early turbulence to realise the vision she has outlined for her lifestyle brand.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents recent developments regarding Meghan Markle's 'As Ever' brand, including its initial success and subsequent operational challenges. The earliest known publication date of similar content is April 2, 2025, when the brand's debut collection sold out within an hour. ([townandcountrymag.com](https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a64364715/meghan-markle-first-as-ever-drop-sold-out/?utm_source=openai)) The report appears to be based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, the inclusion of updated data alongside older material suggests that while the update may justify a higher freshness score, it should still be flagged. Additionally, the narrative includes references to previous reports from April 2025, indicating that some content may be recycled. The report does not appear to be republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative includes a direct quote from Meghan Markle: 'Our shelves may be empty, but my heart is full! We sold out in less than one hour, and I can't thank you enough... for celebrating, purchasing, sharing, and believing.' This quote was first reported on April 2, 2025, when the brand's debut collection sold out within an hour. ([townandcountrymag.com](https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a64364715/meghan-markle-first-as-ever-drop-sold-out/?utm_source=openai)) The wording matches the original source, indicating that the quote has been reused. No variations in wording were found. No online matches were found for other direct quotes, suggesting that they may be original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Mail, a reputable UK newspaper. However, the report includes references to previous reports from April 2025, indicating that some content may be recycled. The inclusion of updated data alongside older material suggests that while the update may justify a higher freshness score, it should still be flagged. The report does not appear to be republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents plausible claims regarding the operational challenges faced by Meghan Markle's 'As Ever' brand, including the decision to halt sales until next year and the speculation about creating artificial scarcity. These claims are consistent with previous reports from April 2025, which highlighted the brand's initial success and subsequent operational challenges. ([townandcountrymag.com](https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a64364715/meghan-markle-first-as-ever-drop-sold-out/?utm_source=openai)) The narrative lacks supporting detail from other reputable outlets, which is a concern. The report includes specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, enhancing its credibility. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic. The structure does not include excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim. The tone is appropriately dramatic and resembles typical corporate or official language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent developments regarding Meghan Markle's 'As Ever' brand, including its initial success and subsequent operational challenges. While the report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score, the inclusion of updated data alongside older material suggests that while the update may justify a higher freshness score, it should still be flagged. The direct quote from Meghan Markle matches the original source, indicating that it has been reused. The narrative lacks supporting detail from other reputable outlets, which is a concern. Overall, the report is plausible and consistent with previous reports from April 2025, but the recycling of content and lack of additional supporting details warrant further scrutiny.