Burberry has recently reported a troubling financial situation, revealing a loss of £66 million for the past year compared to a profit of £383 million the previous year. This downturn has coincided with the company's announcement of plans to cut approximately 1,700 jobs globally by 2027, which constitutes about 20% of its workforce. These decisions come under the leadership of new chief executive Joshua Schulman, who has been at the helm for just nine months. Despite the job cuts, Schulman's compensation totals nearly £2.6 million, including £380,000 allocated for relocation expenses, bringing his overall salary for this brief period to a striking figure.

The financial losses are particularly alarming in light of the declining luxury goods sector, amplified by various misjudgments in strategy, as suggested by the company's recent annual report. Schulman, previously the CEO of renowned brands like Coach, is attempting to pivot Burberry back to its roots. His strategy involves refocusing on the brand’s core heritage products, such as the iconic trench coats and scarves, while aiming to achieve significant cost savings postures.

While Burberry’s share price has seen an increase of almost 50% since Schulman took over, primarily driven by his plans for revitalisation, the contrast is stark when juxtaposed against the backdrop of imminent job losses. The proposed cuts were presented as part of a larger initiative to target £100 million in annual savings—£60 million in fresh cuts alongside £40 million from a previous plan. As the company adapts to the current economic climate, the rationale for such drastic measures has been questioned by commentators. Andrew Speke from the High Pay Centre voiced concerns, highlighting the ethical implications of massive executive compensations amid workforce reductions and suggesting that such practices might harm employee morale.

Schulman’s substantial potential earnings, which could reach £5.6 million this year if bonus targets are met, stand in sharp contrast to the company’s financial woes. Coupled with a further potential bonus contingent upon doubling the company’s share price within three years, this pay structure raises eyebrows, particularly when the firm is grappling with decreasing consumer demand across several key markets, including mainland China, where a 7% dip in sales has been noted.

In recent months, Burberry's approach towards its workforce has shifted dramatically, as evidenced by plans to eliminate an entire night shift at its trench coat manufacturing site in Yorkshire. This decision underpins the broader narrative of cost-cutting strategies intended to address overproduction and align with Schulman’s vision for the brand—one that seeks to emphasise its rich British heritage.

In summary, Burberry finds itself at a critical juncture, navigating significant organisational changes and financial instability. As Schulman embarks on his ambitious plan to navigate the luxury brand back to prominence, the juxtaposition of executive pay against workforce reductions raises pressing questions about the ethics of corporate governance in the luxury retail sector.

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services