In October 2025, India’s rapidly evolving tech policy landscape witnessed critical regulatory developments, raising profound questions about the governance of digital content, artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, and emerging technologies like drones. These changes reflect an intensifying government effort to balance innovation, accountability, and national security in a burgeoning digital economy.

One of the most noteworthy amendments concerns the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (IT Rules, 2021), particularly around the regulation of synthetically generated information such as deepfakes. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has proposed new obligations for companies enabling users to create AI-generated content. Under the draft amendment, such content must be labelled with visible metadata covering at least 10% of the visual display or audio duration. This measure aims to create legal clarity and enhance accountability in the spread of synthetic media, moving beyond earlier non-binding advisories issued in 2023 and 2024. By mandating prominent labelling, MeitY seeks traceability of synthetic content to tackle misinformation and potential harm while raising fundamental questions: Can AI companies be classified as intermediaries under the IT Act, 2000? Or is separate, specific regulation needed? Critics also query the practicality of labelling given the scale of content generated today and the impact on legitimate free speech activities such as satire and parody.

In parallel, the government has tightened controls around the removal of “unlawful content” online. The amendment to the IT Rules now restricts the authority to issue takedown orders strictly to senior officials of Joint Secretary rank or equivalent and above, including deputy inspector generals for police. These officers must provide written justifications grounded in statutory law, with content removals subject to monthly reviews by Secretary-level bureaucrats to ensure necessity and proportionality. This reform follows a public spat between the government and Elon Musk’s social media platform X (formerly Twitter), where complaints of excessive takedowns, including of satirical content, prompted judicial scrutiny and policy revision. Though these steps enhance transparency and curtail indiscriminate censorship, concerns remain about the broad interpretation of “unlawful content” and the lack of independent judicial oversight to prevent potential misuse. Legal experts also note the burden on users to challenge content removals persists despite the higher threshold for issuance of orders.

Beyond content regulation, the Madras High Court made a landmark ruling recognising cryptocurrency as a form of property under Indian law. The case involved a petition to prevent interference with 3,532 XRP tokens amidst cybersecurity incidents involving the exchange WazirX. The court highlighted that cryptocurrencies possess characteristics akin to ownership, control, and enjoyment, despite their intangible nature, similar to entries on a blockchain ledger. This classification as property brings forth complex legal questions about whether crypto is movable or immovable property and its implications for taxation, succession, and insolvency frameworks. Furthermore, the court’s assertion that cryptocurrencies can be “held in trust” introduces potential fiduciary responsibilities for exchanges, framing them as trustees with heightened duties towards their users. This recognition marks a significant step in integrating digital assets into India’s legal and regulatory regime.

In the aviation and technology sectors, the Ministry of Civil Aviation introduced the Draft Civil Drone (Promotion and Regulation) Bill, 2025, aiming to replace antiquated colonial-era drone rules. The bill places the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) as the primary regulator for civilian drones while exempting military and police unmanned aircraft systems. It requires drone registration, type certification, and unique identification numbers, along with zonal airspace categorisation (Green, Yellow, Red) and prior permissions for various operations. An innovative Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) system will be managed by authorities such as the Airports Authority of India. Though designed to balance innovation with safety and security, the framework raises concerns about regulatory burdens on startups and the adequacy of governance mechanisms to manage complex airspace, especially in sensitive regions.

Meanwhile, on the front of digital identity security, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) launched the Scheme for Innovation and Technology Association with Aadhaar (SITAA), inviting startups to devise AI-based solutions to combat Aadhaar fraud. Challenges include face liveness detection, presentation attack detection to spot deepfakes and manipulated media, and contactless fingerprint authentication using smartphone cameras. Questions abound on whether AI authentication is mature and scalable for a database exceeding 1.3 billion individuals, and its functionality in India’s diverse environmental and technological contexts.

Other notable regulatory movements reflect India’s strategic industry priorities. A recent government proposal mandates e-commerce platforms to introduce filters identifying products by country of origin, reinforcing India’s self-reliance and domestic manufacturing under evolving global trade pressures, particularly amid increased U.S. tariffs. Simultaneously, India plans to remove a 6% tax on digital advertisements targeting foreign companies to ease tensions with the United States and advance trade deals. The government is also set to present a simplified income tax law to minimize litigation and improve compliance.

In the renewable energy sector, new norms require wind turbine manufacturers to source critical components domestically and localize data storage, signaling a strong push to bolster Indian manufacturing capacity while controlling sensitive operational data within national boundaries.

Together, these developments mark a crucial phase in India’s tech-policy landscape as the government seeks to regulate a complex digital ecosystem in ways that encourage innovation, protect citizens, and assert national interests. However, each regulatory step invites important questions about feasibility, rights, and the potential for overreach, challenges that stakeholders, policymakers, and the judiciary must continue to navigate.

📌 Reference Map:

  • [1] (Medianama) - Entire article
  • [2] (Times of India) - Paragraphs 2, 3
  • [3] (Reuters) - Paragraph 3
  • [4] (Reuters) - Paragraph 7
  • [5] (Reuters) - Paragraph 8
  • [6] (Reuters) - Paragraph 8
  • [7] (Reuters) - Paragraph 8

Source: Noah Wire Services