In recent times, the phrase traditionally used in courts of England and Wales, "All rise!" has come under scrutiny for its perceived lack of inclusivity. An announcement from His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service has suggested that this time-honoured command be modified to "All rise, if able," ostensibly to accommodate those who may be unable to stand, such as the elderly or disabled. Critics are divided; some view this change as an unnecessary formality, while others see it as a necessary step towards inclusivity.
The evolution of language in public institutions like the courts often reflects broader societal shifts. Detractors, including Conservative MP Jack Rankin, have labelled the adjustment as "unnecessary virtue-signalling," arguing that the focus should remain on urgent matters such as addressing the backlog of trials exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Richard Tice of Reform UK echoed this sentiment, asserting that tradition is being sacrificed at the altar of what he terms 'wokery'.
Supporting the change, officials like Nick Goodwin contend that even the addition of two words can significantly enhance accessibility within the justice system. The argument rests on the belief that language plays a crucial role in creating inclusive environments. However, this rationale raises questions: Does altering historical phrases genuinely affect a person's ability to engage with the judicial system, or is it merely a superficial adjustment designed to placate a vocal minority?
Indeed, the discussion surrounding language in public life extends beyond the courtroom. The NHS has faced similar controversies over terms like "birthing people," which has been critiqued for erasing the identity of women in healthcare narratives. Health Secretary Victoria Atkins has publicly condemned such terminology, asserting the need to maintain clear language that respects the identities of women and mothers. This dispute highlights an ongoing struggle between gender inclusivity and the preservation of traditional language, with both sides voicing concerns over identity and respect.
For instance, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust adopted a gender-inclusive language policy, promoting terms like "chestfeeding" to cater to transgender and non-binary patients. While these changes are meant to enhance the healthcare experience for marginalized groups, they have instigated a backlash from individuals who feel that such language undermines women's rights and identity. Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies has been particularly vocal on this, calling for respectful debate on the significance of language surrounding women's health.
Moreover, the recent trend towards rebranding, as seen with Sadiq Khan's £6.3 million initiative to rename the London Overground, has faced criticism for being more of a public relations exercise than a substantive shift towards inclusivity. With names that commemorate various groups, including the Windrush generation and female footballers, the move arguably risks diluting the essence of the original identifiers and instead highlights the tendency of leaders to engage in performative acts of inclusivity.
As language evolves in diverse settings, it often invites scepticism. Observers may wonder whether changes are genuinely representative of societal needs or if they serve to reinforce the authority of those who enact them. The Law Society Gazette noted uncertainty on whether the traditional command ever genuinely impeded access to justice, suggesting that perhaps the offence taken by some may be contrived rather than grounded in lived experiences.
The rapid shift in how language is developed and utilised raises poignant questions about the implications of these adjustments. Ultimately, as discussions of gender, identity, and language continue to unfold, this becomes not just a matter of words—it's a question of societal values and the inclusivity we aspire to achieve. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is important that discussions remain grounded in respect and understanding, ensuring that the narratives we create include all voices without dismissing anyone's essential identity.
Reference Map
Source: Noah Wire Services