A rare minting error on 2008 20p coins has created a valuable collector’s item worth up to £60 each. Around 250,000 coins were struck without a date due to a mismatched die, known as a mule error, sparking renewed interest among collectors and urging the public to check their change.
An expert in numismatics is encouraging individuals to scrutinise their 20p coins, as a select few minted in 2008 could fetch up to £60 each. The attention surrounding these coins stems from a rare minting error that has greatly enhanced their value to collectors.
The specific coins of interest were produced during a limited run by the Royal Mint, during which a small number, approximately 250,000 out of 136 million minted that year, were inadvertently struck using an old obverse die in combination with a new reverse design, resulting in undated coins. This phenomenon has been identified as a "mule error," where mismatched dies lead to the absence of a date.
The Coin Collecting Wizard, an authority on the subject, emphasised the rarity of these undated coins, stating: “Stop spending your 20p coins without checking them first because one from 2008 with no date is worth £60.” According to the expert, although these coins are classified as rare, they are not entirely impossible to discover in everyday transactions. Many collectors continue to find them in circulation even years after their minting.
In 2008, the Royal Mint confirmed the occurrence of this error, which has made these coins highly sought after. Collectors have reported instances of undated coins exchanging hands at prices considerably beyond their face value. Some recent auction results highlight this phenomenon: undated 20p coins have sold for as much as £78 on platforms like eBay, greatly surpassing their nominal worth.
Notably, while these coins possess a legal tender value of 20p, their collector's value is stemming from their unique status as the first undated British coin in over 300 years. The Royal Mint has provided resources for identifying these coins, further aiding both collectors and the curious public in distinguishing between regular and potentially valuable coins.
As interest in coin collecting continues to flourish, driven by the thrill of discovery and the potential for profit, enthusiasts are urged to delve into their change. Those who have held onto these coins may be sitting on a hidden treasure; thus, the message from experts remains clear: check your coins before spending them, as you may hold a piece of numismatic history.
The allure of these undated 20p coins serves as a reminder of the unexpected treasures hidden in everyday transactions and the often-unrecognised intricacies of currency production.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is based on a press release from the Royal Mint, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, similar reports have appeared in various reputable outlets, such as the Oxford Mail and the Worcester News, indicating that the information has been disseminated across multiple platforms. ([oxfordmail.co.uk](https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/24666632.royal-mint-rare-20p-mule-coin-sells-75---spot/?utm_source=openai), [worcesternews.co.uk](https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/24513729.royal-mint-error-rare-20p-sells-250x-face-value/?utm_source=openai)) This widespread coverage suggests that the content may not be entirely original. Additionally, the earliest known publication date of similar content is from July 2009, when the Royal Mint first issued a statement about the undated 20p coins. ([pcgs.com](https://www.pcgs.com/News/British-Royal-Mint-Issues-2008-Mule-Error-Coins?utm_source=openai)) This indicates that the core information has been available for over a decade, raising questions about the novelty of the current report. The presence of updated data, such as recent auction results, may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([mirror.co.uk](https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/brits-urged-check-change-extremely-30390783?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The direct quote from 'The Coin Collecting Wizard' stating, “Stop spending your 20p coins without checking them first because one from 2008 with no date is worth £60,” appears to be unique to this report. A search for this exact phrase yields no earlier matches, suggesting that it may be original or exclusive content. However, the lack of corroboration from other reputable sources raises questions about the authenticity of the quote. The wording of the quote varies slightly from similar statements found in other reports, which may indicate paraphrasing or misattribution. Without additional verification, the originality of the quote remains uncertain.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Birmingham Mail, a regional newspaper. While it is a known publication, it is not as widely recognized as national outlets like the BBC or Reuters. This raises questions about the reliability and credibility of the source. Additionally, the report includes a direct quote from 'The Coin Collecting Wizard,' an entity that cannot be verified online. The absence of a public presence, records, or a legitimate website for this entity suggests that it may be fabricated or a pseudonym. This further undermines the reliability of the narrative.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claim that undated 20p coins from 2008 can fetch up to £60 is plausible, as similar reports have indicated that these coins have sold for amounts significantly above their face value. ([mirror.co.uk](https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/brits-urged-check-change-extremely-30390783?utm_source=openai)) The narrative provides specific details about the minting error and the rarity of the coins, which are consistent with known information. However, the inclusion of a direct quote from an unverifiable source and the lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets raise concerns about the overall credibility of the report. The tone and language used in the narrative are consistent with typical news reporting, but the presence of unverifiable elements suggests that further scrutiny is warranted.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents information about the rarity and value of undated 20p coins from 2008, which is consistent with known facts. However, the reliance on a press release and the inclusion of a direct quote from an unverifiable source raise significant concerns about the originality and reliability of the content. The widespread dissemination of similar reports across multiple platforms further suggests that the information may not be original. Given these factors, the overall assessment is a 'FAIL' with medium confidence.
