Aberdeen City Council faces mounting criticism as the cost of its ambitious rapid transit bus system more than doubles to £323 million, sparking fears over the project’s viability and economic impact. Business owners and residents vehemently oppose controversial bus gates, while council leaders prepare for a decisive meeting on the future of the decade-long scheme.
City officials in Aberdeen are grappling with a controversial £323 million proposal for a rapid transit bus system that critics claim is “dead in the water.” The latest developments reveal a stark increase from the initial estimate of £150 million, raising questions about the project's viability and its potential impact on the city’s economy. The council has been working on the project for over three years, with plans that echo the Belfast Glider system, which has seen a positive uptick in public transport usage since its launch in 2018. The proposed routes aim to connect key areas, including Blackdog to Westhill and Craibstone to Portlethen, with the hope of boosting local services.
However, the rapidly escalating costs and the ten-year timeline for project implementation have cast a shadow over its future. The increase in estimated expenditure has coincided with community resistance to certain traffic initiatives in the city centre. The implementation of bus gates on Guild Street, Market Street, and Bridge Street—designed to reduce congestion and facilitate the ART scheme—has been roundly opposed by business owners and residents alike. Planning officials insist these restrictions are crucial for securing £150 million in grants aimed at funding the ART initiative, yet they have faced persistent backlash, leading to a campaign raising funds to challenge these measures in court.
Tory group leader Richard Brooks has been vocal in his opposition, claiming that the council's leadership has sacrificed the interests of local businesses for what he describes as a “farcical” project. He articulated a sentiment echoed by many in the community: “Our city is in tatters under this SNP/Lib Dem anti-car directive... I have yet to find one person who believes the bus gates were ever a good idea.” Brooks argues that the bus gates have impoverished the high street, transforming it into a “ghost town,” and he urges a reassessment of the entire rapid transit plan.
The council's programme manager, Kirsty Chalmers, has countered that the proposed bus priority route could effectively reverse a 20-year decline in bus passenger numbers. She highlighted plans for 24-hour bus lanes intended to expedite journeys, which would involve constructing 30 miles of roadway and integrating 70 junctions. The ART initiative aligns with broader efforts in the region to enhance public transport accessibility and appeal, aiming to reduce the carbon footprint and stimulate economic activity.
In contrasting views, some proponents within the ruling coalition maintain that the rapid transit project is a necessary leap into modern public transport infrastructure. SNP transport vice-convener Miranda Radley argued that the success of the Belfast system provides a model for what could be achieved in Aberdeen, stating, “The Aberdeen Rapid Transit could bring our city centre and public transport network into the 21st century.”
Despite the divided opinions, clarity on the local authority's stance is expected soon as council leaders convene next week to formally discuss the ART plans.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents a £323 million proposal for Aberdeen's rapid transit bus system, a significant increase from the previously estimated £150 million. This escalation is notable, as the initial £150 million estimate was reported in June 2024. ([pressandjournal.co.uk](https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/transport/6510675/aberdeen-rapid-transit-route/?utm_source=openai)) The recent report does not appear to be a republished version of earlier content, indicating a high freshness score. However, the substantial increase in projected costs warrants further scrutiny. Additionally, the narrative references the Belfast Glider system, which has been operational since 2018, suggesting that some information may be recycled. Nonetheless, the focus on the new £323 million proposal and its implications for Aberdeen's economy provides a fresh perspective.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from Tory group leader Richard Brooks and council's programme manager Kirsty Chalmers. A search reveals that similar statements from these individuals have been reported in earlier articles, such as those from June 2024. ([pressandjournal.co.uk](https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/6718545/aberdeen-transit-council-150m-bus-plans/?utm_source=openai)) This suggests that the quotes may have been reused, potentially indicating recycled content. However, the specific context and phrasing in the recent narrative provide additional details, which may justify a higher freshness score.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Press and Journal, a reputable Scottish newspaper known for its comprehensive local coverage. This association enhances the credibility of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The proposed £323 million cost for the Aberdeen Rapid Transit system is a significant increase from the earlier £150 million estimate. While such escalations can occur in large infrastructure projects, the lack of detailed breakdowns in the narrative makes it challenging to fully assess the plausibility of the new figure. The references to the Belfast Glider system, operational since 2018, are accurate and relevant, providing a plausible comparison. However, the absence of supporting details from other reputable outlets regarding the new £323 million proposal raises questions about the completeness of the information.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents a significant update on the Aberdeen Rapid Transit project, highlighting a substantial increase in projected costs. While the source is reputable, the reuse of quotes and the lack of detailed supporting information from other outlets suggest potential issues with freshness and completeness. Further verification and additional sources are recommended to fully assess the accuracy and implications of the new £323 million proposal.