The arrest of two pro-Palestine activists in Belfast has sparked significant controversy, prompting an investigation by the Police Ombudsman. Sue Pentel, 72, and Martine McCullough, 56, were taken into custody on May 24 outside a Barclays Bank branch in Castle Place on suspicion of criminal damage. This incident unfolded during a protest where activists allegedly affixed stickers advocating for a boycott of the bank upon an ATM.

Both Pentel and McCullough have since expressed their dismay over the arrests, labelling them as “ridiculous” and “out of proportion.” Their detainment has raised questions regarding the boundaries of peaceful protest in Northern Ireland. The PSNI defended the actions taken during the protest, describing the arrests as "lawful and proportionate." According to their statement, the women were released later that same day but were reported to the Public Prosecution Service, a move that often accompanies such allegations.

The Police Ombudsman confirmed that an independent investigation into the incident is now underway, following a review of substantial evidence, including body-worn camera footage. This response has garnered support from various human rights advocates. Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland director of Amnesty International, welcomed the investigation, asserting, “People must have the right to peacefully express their views without fear of arbitrary arrest or other disproportionate responses by the police.”

The principle of freedom of expression and assembly is enshrined in law, emphasising the rights of individuals to engage in peaceful protest. A spokesperson for the PSNI reiterated this commitment but highlighted the necessity of balancing such freedoms with public safety and the need to maintain order in urban environments. This difficult equilibrium has become increasingly contentious in light of various protests across the UK, where the response of law enforcement has come under scrutiny.

In a broader context, this incident reflects a troubling trend regarding the treatment of pro-Palestinian activists in the UK, especially in light of recent events. Activists across the country have reported what they perceive as an increasing criminalisation of peaceful protests. For instance, in August 2024, a group of pro-Palestinian activists was arrested under organised crime laws after demonstrating at an arms factory in Kent. This marked the first application of such laws against protesters in the UK, leading to widespread condemnation and fears regarding potential overreach by police.

The Islamic Human Rights Commission has demanded an end to what they describe as the unlawful arrests of pro-Palestinian protesters, urging authorities to respect the right to free expression as outlined under the Human Rights Act. Recent data from the CIVICUS Monitor also indicates a rise in police tactics described as heavy-handed, with reports of excessive force and racial profiling at pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

Within this climate, concerns have been raised about the ability of activists to safely express dissent regarding Israel's policies. The potential for punitive measures against those participating in such protests has fostered a chilling effect on public discourse and activism.

As the investigation into the Belfast arrests unfolds, many will be watching closely, hoping for a resolution that upholds the rights of individuals to peacefully assemble and express dissent without fear of retribution.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services