Following a Sutton Trust report exposing poor educational outcomes for pupils eligible for free school meals in east Brighton, grassroots group Class Divide has called for an independent investigation into systemic failures, urging Brighton and Hove City Council to address persistent disparities in school performance and post-16 opportunities.
Recent research from the Sutton Trust has spotlighted alarming educational disparities affecting pupils in east Brighton, particularly those eligible for free school meals. The findings have stirred the grassroots campaign group, Class Divide, to demand a public review of these persistent inequalities. Their call for action was encapsulated in an open letter to Bella Sankey, the leader of Brighton and Hove City Council, highlighting that the Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven constituency ranks a troubling 527th out of 543 in terms of education outcomes across England.
The statistics are stark. The Sutton Trust reports that merely four per cent of young people in the area attain a degree by the age of 22. When they reach 28, fewer than half are in stable employment. Class Divide’s founder, Carlie Goldsmith, stated, “Children on free school meals growing up in this constituency have some of the worst rates in the whole country on six measures.” These encompass school performance, access to further education, employment status, and earnings post-secondary education. She lamented that only 16 constituencies in England reported even worse outcomes, emphasising that systemic failings, rather than national trends, are at play.
Curtis James, a co-founder of Class Divide who was raised in Whitehawk, echoed this sentiment, recounting how a teacher once told him he wasn’t “university material.” With only one GCSE to his name, James attributes his later success to a rare moment of support from a teacher, underscoring the critical role of belief and opportunity in uplifting students from impoverished backgrounds. His story exemplifies the urgent need for a responsive education system that acknowledges and accommodates the realities faced by working-class children.
The letter from Class Divide frames the situation as a “systemic failure,” questioning why a city known for its vibrant culture and affluence can leave so many youths behind. It specifically calls for an independent review to scrutinise the causes of these poor outcomes, focusing on vital areas such as secondary education, post-16 pathways—including further and higher education and apprenticeships—and the barriers that young people from low-income brackets face.
The council’s recent discussions around school admissions policy have gained traction, particularly after reports emerged showcasing stark educational inequalities within Brighton and Hove. A previous report indicated that only 26% of GCSE students from Moulsecoomb and Bevendean achieved top grades, compared to a commendable 75% in the affluent Withdean ward. These figures underscore a pressing need for targeted interventions to bridge such divides.
In response to these educational gaps, Class Divide has outlined five key demands aimed at enhancing equity within the local education system. These include the creation of yearly reports on school performance in deprived areas and making compulsory training on the experiences of working-class children for educators. The group stresses that addressing these inequalities requires ongoing support for local initiatives and training opportunities—crucial elements for fostering long-term change.
Currently, approximately 275 supporters have signed the open letter, with ambitions to present it to the local council before the month's end. Whether such advocacy will spur actionable changes remains to be seen, yet the demand for immediate attention to educational outcomes for vulnerable young people is clear and urgent.
As Brighton navigates this critical juncture in educational reform, both the council and the community face a challenge to ensure that the city’s wealth and diversity translate into equitable educational opportunities for all its children.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents recent findings from the Sutton Trust regarding educational disparities in East Brighton, particularly among pupils eligible for free school meals. Class Divide's open letter to Bella Sankey, leader of Brighton and Hove City Council, highlights that the Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven constituency ranks 527th out of 543 in terms of education outcomes across England. The statistics indicate that only 4% of young people in the area attain a degree by the age of 22, and fewer than half are in stable employment by age 28. Class Divide's founder, Carlie Goldsmith, emphasizes that children on free school meals in this constituency have some of the worst rates in the country across six measures, including school performance, access to further education, employment status, and earnings post-secondary education. These findings are consistent with previous reports highlighting educational inequalities in East Brighton. For instance, a report from March 2023 noted that in Moulsecoomb and Bevendean, only 26% of GCSE students achieved top grades, compared to 75% in the affluent Withdean ward. ([brightonandhovenews.org](https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2023/03/02/disadvantaged-children-continue-to-lag-behind-better-off-pupils/?utm_source=openai)) Additionally, Class Divide has been actively campaigning for policy changes to address these disparities, such as advocating for priority access for FSM students in secondary school admissions. ([suttontrust.com](https://www.suttontrust.com/fair-school-admissions/class-divide/?utm_source=openai)) While the narrative includes recent data, it also references ongoing issues and previous reports, suggesting a mix of fresh and recycled content. The inclusion of updated data may justify a higher freshness score, but the recycling of older material warrants a flag. The report appears to be based on a press release from Class Divide, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, the presence of recycled content and references to earlier reports necessitate a more nuanced assessment.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from Carlie Goldsmith, founder of Class Divide, and Curtis James, co-founder of Class Divide. A search for these quotes reveals that they have been used in previous materials, such as Class Divide's response to the council's secondary school admission proposals for 2026/27. ([classdivide.co.uk](https://www.classdivide.co.uk/news/making-brighton-amp-hoves-schools-work-for-everyone-class-divides-response-to-the-councils-secondary-school-admission-proposals-for-202627?utm_source=openai)) This suggests that the quotes are not original to this narrative and have been reused in earlier content. The repetition of these quotes indicates that the content may not be entirely original.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Argus, a local newspaper in Brighton and Hove. The Argus is a reputable source for local news and has previously covered educational disparities in the area. For example, in March 2023, The Argus reported on the lagging performance of disadvantaged children compared to their better-off peers. ([brightonandhovenews.org](https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2023/03/02/disadvantaged-children-continue-to-lag-behind-better-off-pupils/?utm_source=openai)) However, the report also references a press release from Class Divide, a grassroots campaign group focused on addressing educational inequalities in Brighton and Hove. Class Divide has been actively involved in advocating for policy changes and has a history of releasing statements and reports on these issues. ([suttontrust.com](https://www.suttontrust.com/fair-school-admissions/class-divide/?utm_source=openai)) The inclusion of a press release from a single-issue campaign group introduces some uncertainty regarding the objectivity and potential bias of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims regarding educational disparities in East Brighton align with previous reports and data. For instance, a report from March 2023 highlighted that in Moulsecoomb and Bevendean, only 26% of GCSE students achieved top grades, compared to 75% in the affluent Withdean ward. ([brightonandhovenews.org](https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2023/03/02/disadvantaged-children-continue-to-lag-behind-better-off-pupils/?utm_source=openai)) Additionally, Class Divide has been actively campaigning for policy changes to address these disparities, such as advocating for priority access for FSM students in secondary school admissions. ([suttontrust.com](https://www.suttontrust.com/fair-school-admissions/class-divide/?utm_source=openai)) The narrative's claims are consistent with these established facts, suggesting a high level of plausibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent findings on educational disparities in East Brighton, referencing both new data and previous reports. While the inclusion of updated data may justify a higher freshness score, the recycling of older material and the use of previously published quotes suggest that the content may not be entirely original. The report's reliance on a press release from Class Divide introduces some uncertainty regarding objectivity and potential bias. However, the claims made are consistent with established facts, indicating a high level of plausibility. Given these factors, the overall assessment is 'OPEN' with a medium confidence level.