The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea is again financing short seaside breaks for older residents who live on the Notting Hill Carnival route, a routinely repeated measure the council says is intended to shield vulnerable neighbours from the noise, crowds and disruption the festival brings. According to press reporting, a proposed three‑night outing to Eastbourne will cost roughly £25,600 in total — around £1,100 per head — and is arranged in partnership with the local Age UK branch; organisers say the sum covers coach travel, hotel accommodation, staffing and associated care and insurance.

The scheme is not new. The council and Age UK say they have run the respite trips since 2017, prioritising people aged 65 and over whose health or wellbeing can be affected by very large, noisy public events. Kensington and Chelsea’s own publicity describes the offer as part of a wider package of support around Carnival — including targeted information booklets, a helpline and additional street‑cleaning crews deployed on the bank holiday weekend. Age UK Kensington and Chelsea’s material similarly emphasises social programmes and practical help for older residents, and frames the outing as a wellbeing measure rather than a standalone luxury.

Council spokespeople have publicly defended the arrangement. Cllr Kim Taylor‑Smith, the authority’s lead member for culture, told a local outlet that Carnival is “a wonderful celebration enjoyed by so many people” but that “the sights, sounds and crowds are not for everyone”, adding that the trip “offers a bit of calm for some of our older residents who would prefer not to be at the heart of the action.” A statement on the borough’s website from the lead member for culture reiterated the priority given to applicants who meet strict eligibility criteria and pointed to the council’s broader services for residents affected by the event.

Public accounts of who takes part and how much it costs vary between years, which adds context to the headline figures. Local reporting cited a year in which 21 residents travelled at a cost of about £24,000, while the council’s own announcements have in other years referred to larger bookings — 42 places were noted on the borough’s website in a recent description of the scheme. The unit cost therefore shifts with cohort size and with the operational details of each outing, a point the council and charity partners make when defending the per‑person headline.

The respite scheme sits against the backdrop of renewed concern about safety and policing at Notting Hill Carnival. Operational police figures published after the festival’s most recent weekend recorded multiple serious incidents, including eight stabbings and several hundred arrests across the two days; the Metropolitan Police’s public update itemised charges ranging from possession of offensive weapons to assaults on emergency workers. Those figures have been cited by festival organisers and public officials in calls for extra resources to manage crowd safety.

Organisers of the carnival have themselves warned that the event’s future could be put at risk without additional funding to address crowd‑management and public‑safety shortfalls identified in an independent review. The carnival’s chair wrote to the Culture Secretary to request urgent support, saying extra money was “essential to safeguarding the future and public safety of this iconic event”; the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it would consider the request. The letter and review have fuelled debate about how best to reconcile the festival’s cultural importance with the practical demands of policing and crowd control.

That cultural importance is not in dispute: Notting Hill Carnival began as a community celebration in 1966 and has grown into a major showcase of Caribbean music, masquerade and street culture. The festival’s organisers and many residents point to its origins in local community organising and to its continued role as an annual celebration of Black British culture and creativity — factors that complicate any simple cost‑benefit accounting about public support or council interventions.

Taken together, the council‑funded trips and the wider debate over safety funding underline competing responsibilities facing local authorities: to support vulnerable residents who are directly affected by large events, while also working with organisers and central government to ensure major public gatherings can continue safely and sustainably. The council and Age UK characterise the outings as a compassionate, targeted service for older people; critics will continue to scrutinise the use of public money and to press for transparent accounting of costs and outcomes as the conversation about Carnival’s future proceeds.

📌 Reference Map:

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services