Archaeologists have uncovered what may be the oldest known human fingerprint on a 43,000-year-old pebble in Spain, attributed to Neanderthals. The mark, enhanced with red ochre pigment and positioned to mimic a facial feature, suggests deliberate artistic expression and challenges long-held views about Neanderthal cognitive abilities.
Archaeologists have made a remarkable discovery in the San Lázaro rock shelter in Spain: a 43,000-year-old pebble bearing what is thought to be the oldest known human fingerprint, attributed to Neanderthals. This finding not only showcases a distinct imprint, potentially made by an adult male, but also points to early symbolic thought as it appears to enhance the rock's resemblance to a facial figure. The red pigment used resembles ochre, suggesting deliberate application rather than accidental smudging, leading researchers to consider the possibility of artistic intent behind the mark.
As investigations progressed, teams employed advanced imaging techniques revealing dermatoglyphic details—characteristics typical of human fingerprints. Notably, the analysis indicated that the pigment's location directly correlated with what could be interpreted as a nose on the rock’s surface, a strong indicator that Neanderthals engaged in creative expression. According to Professor María de Andrés-Herrero from the Complutense University, the rock stands out due to its unique qualities, prompting a reconsideration of Neanderthals' cognitive and artistic capabilities.
This discovery arrives amidst an evolving narrative about Neanderthal creativity. Historically viewed as primitive, recent evidence suggests that they engaged in complex behaviour, including making art. Studies have shown Neanderthals were responsible for various forms of cave art across different Spanish sites, with motifs dating back at least 64,000 years, predating the arrival of modern humans in Europe. Earlier findings have established that Neanderthals created hand stencils and symbolic paintings, leading to increasing recognition of their artistic endeavours and symbolic thinking.
Despite some scepticism about categorising the fingerprint mark as art, experts argue that it underscores a capacity for abstract thought and individuality among Neanderthals. Archaeologist David Álvarez Alonso highlighted the strategic placement of the pigment, indicating intentional selection that goes beyond mere functionality. Even though controversies remain regarding the interpretation of Neanderthal art and their cognitive abilities, this pebble acts as a catalyst for ongoing discussions around their artistic expression.
The implications of this discovery extend far beyond immediate aesthetics. It highlights that Neanderthals possessed a level of sophistication earlier assumed to belong solely to later human populations. Experts suggest that this might reflect a broader cultural narrative, with Neanderthal creativity extending into personal and communal realms. As research continues, the San Lázaro pebble may offer critical insights into how early hominins exhibited symbolic behaviour, fundamentally challenging our understanding of their cognitive landscape.
Ultimately, the evolving interpretations of such findings highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of Neanderthal life and culture, reinforcing their place as complex beings who once navigated not only the physical world but also their inner lives filled with meaning and expression. The study of this significant artefact underscores the importance of recognising the artistic potential inherent in all cultures, inviting further inquiry into our shared human heritage.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative was published on May 28, 2025, and has been covered by reputable outlets such as Live Science. ([livescience.com](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/43-000-year-old-human-fingerprint-is-worlds-oldest-and-made-by-a-neanderthal?utm_source=openai)) The earliest known publication date of similar content is May 28, 2025, indicating high freshness. The report appears to be based on a recent press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative does not recycle older material, and the updated data justifies a higher freshness score. No content similar to this has appeared more than 7 days earlier. The report includes updated data and does not recycle older material. The update justifies a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The direct quotes from Professor María de Andrés-Herrero and archaeologist David Álvarez Alonso are unique to this report. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating potentially original or exclusive content. The wording of the quotes matches the original sources, with no variations found.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from Earth.com, a reputable organisation known for its scientific reporting. The report cites sources such as Live Science and SAPIENS, both reputable outlets. The individuals mentioned, including Professor María de Andrés-Herrero and archaeologist David Álvarez Alonso, are verifiable online, with public profiles and legitimate affiliations.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claim of a 43,000-year-old Neanderthal fingerprint on a painted rock in Spain is plausible and aligns with recent archaeological findings. The narrative is covered by reputable outlets, including Live Science. ([livescience.com](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/43-000-year-old-human-fingerprint-is-worlds-oldest-and-made-by-a-neanderthal?utm_source=openai)) The report includes specific factual anchors, such as the location (San Lázaro rock shelter, Spain), the artefact (43,000-year-old pebble), and the individuals involved (Professor María de Andrés-Herrero and archaeologist David Álvarez Alonso). The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic, and the structure is focused on the claim without excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is formal and resembles typical scientific reporting.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, with no recycled content or discrepancies found. The quotes are unique and match the original sources. The source is reputable, and the individuals mentioned are verifiable. The claim is plausible and supported by specific factual anchors. The language and tone are appropriate, and the structure is focused on the claim. No credibility risks were identified.