Vic Moy’s Notting Hill Carnival series foregrounds intimate moments of resilience and joy, blending personal healing with a commitment to inclusive practice and cultural advocacy.
Vic Moy, a London-based photographer raised in a belief system where children were seen but not heard, describes her work as a deliberate act of permission—to speak, feel, reflect, heal and grow. She has spoken of a hopeful future, where “it's safe to feel, somewhere frostbite doesn’t exist,” a line that threads through her practice and colours the emotional gravity of her images. Moy’s Notting Hill Carnival project sits at the heart of that intention, offering a quiet, intimate counterpoint to the spectacle around her. The Guardian’s archive of Notting Hill Carnival photography captures the festival’s decades-long energy, colour and pageantry, as well as the evolving dynamics of crowd movement and community under threat from far-reaching social pressures. The juxtaposition helps situate Moy’s work within a broader chronicle of a city’s infrastructural and cultural shifts as it welcomes diverse communities to the streets of West London.
Last year Moy returned to Notting Hill Carnival for a second pass, steering her approach with more time spent in cultural research before raising her camera. She describes the series as “a story of resilience and one of joy,” and explains that her preparation centres on listening to the people around her and tracing the journeys of elders who helped shape the UK’s Black British history. Her intent was to reveal the small, radiant moments—feathers, flag capes and dollar chains—while focusing on inner beauty, identity and the extraordinary spirit of each individual. The project is also framed by a broader discourse around representation and collaboration; Moy has noted the importance of addressing disability representation through advocacy work associated with With Not For, an organisation dedicated to inclusive practice in the creative industries and beyond.
Notting Hill Carnival remains, in this account, a living, evolving symbol of London’s diversity, built on Caribbean migration and the Windrush era. Reuters has described the festival as a space of unity and cultural exchange, underscoring its role in promoting inclusion even as the city contends with racially charged incidents and a complicated public memory of the Windrush generation. The event’s scale and its social significance are echoed by AP News, which documents hundreds of thousands attending over two days—the Children’s Day and the adult parade—while situating the carnival within the broader historical arc of migration, post-war Britain and the ongoing challenges of security and community resilience. Taken together, Moy’s intimate photography and the wider coverage of the carnival sketch a portrait of Notting Hill as a site where art, memory and advocacy intersect, and where inclusive representation remains an active, evolving practice.
📌 Reference Map:
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
✅ The narrative under review (It’s Nice That) was published on 21 August 2025 (ItsNiceThat page shows Date: 21 August 2025). 🕰️ Related reporting about Notting Hill Carnival (Reuters/AP coverage referenced in the narrative) dates from August 2024 (e.g. Reuters: 26–27 Aug 2024; AP coverage in 2024). ⚠️ The profile draws on Moy’s CRNVL ’24 work (copyright 2024 noted in the gallery), so elements about the event and archive material are recycled background rather than newly reported events. ‼️ Because aspects of the carnival context (attendance figures, policing, historical framing) have been widely reported since Aug 2024, the piece is not breaking news about the festival itself, but is a fresh profile published in Aug 2025. If similar write-ups or reprints exist (see smaller aggregation sites republishing the piece on 21 Aug 2025), those are republications rather than earlier provenance.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
✅ Distinct quotes attributed to Vic Moy appear verbatim on the ItsNiceThat page (e.g. “it's safe to feel, somewhere frostbite doesn’t exist”; “a story of resilience and one of joy”). 🔎 A live search found these lines on the ItsNiceThat page (21 Aug 2025) and on subsequent republished summaries (aggregators on 21 Aug 2025). ⚠️ No identical matches were found dated earlier than the ItsNiceThat publication in my searches, suggesting the quotes are original to this interview/profile or first published by It’s Nice That. If identical wording appears elsewhere prior to 21 Aug 2025, that would indicate reused material — I found no evidence of such earlier matches in the live checks.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
✅ It’s Nice That is a recognised UK creative/culture outlet and the profile is authored by a named writer (Sudi Jama) with a publication date — this is a strength. ✅ The narrative also cites and references established organisations/journalism (Reuters, AP, The Guardian) for contextual claims about Notting Hill Carnival. ⚠️ Some of the supporting links in the reference map point to reputable outlets (Reuters, AP, The Guardian) — that bolsters reliability for the carnival context. ‼️ Where the narrative references With Not For (a disability-centred creative agency), that organisation is verifiable online (withnotfor.co.uk); the named principals (Kelly and Emma) are plausibly correct in context but are less widely documented in major outlets — treat those specific attribution details as lower-weight but not unverified.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
✅ Claims are plausible and consistent with public record: the CRNVL ’24 project is presented as 2024 work (copyright 2024 on images), and Reuters/AP coverage of Notting Hill Carnival in Aug 2024 documents large attendance and context cited in the narrative. ✅ Time-sensitive claims (dates, carnival scale, Windrush historical framing) align with contemporaneous reporting from Aug 2024. ⚠️ The piece is a photographer profile and includes subjective description and artistic language; such tone is expected and not an integrity concern. ‼️ No surprising claims (e.g. fabricated events, impossible timelines) were detected; the only caution is that historical/contextual claims about policing, arrests or attendance should be cross-checked against the cited Reuters/AP pieces for exact figures before republication — the profile uses general framing rather than precise new data.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
✅ The profile of Vic Moy published on It’s Nice That on 21 August 2025 appears to be a legitimate cultural feature: quotes attributed to Moy appear first in this piece (no earlier matches found), With Not For is a verifiable organisation, and the carnival context is supported by established reporting (Reuters/AP/The Guardian from Aug 2024). 🕰️ However, the piece draws on CRNVL ’24 imagery and widely reported 2024 coverage of Notting Hill Carnival, meaning parts of the narrative are recycled background rather than newly discovered facts — flagging this lowers the freshness risk but does not invalidate the profile. ⚠️ Key risks: recycled context from Aug 2024 reporting (‼️), possible republishing by aggregators on the same date (watch for low-quality republications), and a few attributions (named individuals at smaller organisations) that carry less independent coverage. Overall: PASS — the material is credible as a feature/profile, but editors should verify any specific numeric claims (attendance/arrests) against the original Reuters/AP pieces before reusing those figures. ✅