As digital natives enter adulthood, many are reassessing the impact of smartphones and social media on their formative years. A generation that was once an enthusiastic advocate for technology now expresses profound concerns about its effects, particularly regarding children's access to devices. Sophie, now an 18-year-old student at the University of Edinburgh, reflects on her own experiences with smartphones as a child. She recalls receiving shocking videos from classmates, including explicit and violent content, which left lasting impressions. “My parents’ generation simply didn’t have a clue,” she observes, highlighting a generational gap in understanding the potential dangers of unfettered online access.

This shift in perspective among young adults has been corroborated by recent surveys revealing that nearly half of young people would prefer a world without the internet. Additionally, a considerable portion supports the idea of a digital curfew for children. More than three-quarters feel that their self-esteem has suffered as a result of social media interactions. The critical sentiment is echoed by others, like Izzy Bouric, a 24-year-old artist living in Paris. Bouric states that the blurring of boundaries between childhood and adult online spaces on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok poses significant risks. Past online environments, like Club Penguin, had rigid rules to safeguard young users from adult content; a stark contrast to the current landscape where young children encounter harmful material and violent rhetoric.

Moreover, the Netflix documentary series Adolescence has catalysed conversations about the myriad ways social media can be detrimental to young minds. Bouric herself experienced what she describes as an oppressive environment dominated by corporate advertising and pervasive misinformation, leading her to abandon her smartphone in favour of a flip phone that allows her to reclaim precious time and mental space. Similarly, 20-year-old Tobias from Austria notes how smartphones have changed social dynamics among his peers. He observed a decline in genuine interactions, replaced instead by invisible threads of communication that tether individuals to their devices. Furthermore, he has recognized the alarming content that algorithms served him based on his interests, which has led him to advocate for delayed access to smartphones for children and teenagers.

Leah, also at the tender age of 20, expresses a similar reluctance to introduce smartphones to younger family members, suggesting that access should wait until the age of 16, with close monitoring of media interactions. She recounts how her friends faced bullying in schools, observed diminished attention spans, and became preoccupied with social media, often to the detriment of their creativity and interpersonal skills. The concern extends beyond personal anecdotes; research presented by social psychologists like Jonathan Haidt indicates a troubling rise in rates of anxiety and depression among adolescents coinciding with increased smartphone use—an issue that underscores the need for structured guidelines and perhaps legislation around technology use.

The complexities surrounding children’s smartphone use have prompted advocacy efforts, including movements like MAMA (Mothers Against Media Addiction), which aims to educate parents on the effects of social media and promote safer environments for children. Legislative initiatives, such as the Kids Online Safety Act in the U.S., seek to address these issues by enhancing parental controls and minimising exposure to harmful content, garnering bipartisan support amidst a national conversation about children’s safety online.

In France, a government-appointed committee has issued strong recommendations to mitigate screen exposure among young people. They advocate for no screen use before age three, significant restrictions until age six, and careful consideration of mobile and internet access thereafter. Such initiatives emphasize the need for more robust societal interventions and industry regulations to protect future generations.

As more young adults voice their apprehensions regarding the digital landscape they grew up in, there is a palpable shift towards advocating for healthier limits on children’s access to technology. This emerging consensus suggests that prior generations might need to reconsider their approach to digital engagement in light of the profound implications for mental health and overall well-being.

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services