The Ohio Senate’s decision to remove a controversial plan from the state budget halts efforts to reduce the State Board of Education from 19 members to five governor-appointed officials, reflecting ongoing tensions over centralisation and local accountability in public education governance.
A contentious proposal to overhaul the Ohio State Board of Education has been shelved following the Ohio Senate's recent decision to exclude it from the state budget. This unexpected development nullifies a House-endorsed plan that sought to scale down the board from 19 members to five, all appointed by the governor. Proponents of the original proposal argued that eliminating elected positions would lead to an estimated annual savings of $50,000, while opponents voiced concerns over the potential loss of local representation and educational expertise.
Critics, including Teresa Fedor, a former Democratic state lawmaker and current board vice president, expressed alarm that such a dramatic reduction in board membership would diminish the professional experience necessary for making significant decisions in the realm of education. "I’m worried about not having enough teaching experience on that board to make the serious decisions," Fedor commented in May, emphasising the importance of elected voices in maintaining accountability and professionalism within the board.
The proposal to shrink the board was part of a broader trend, as substantial powers were already stripped away from the board during the 2023 legislative session. That year, state lawmakers transferred oversight of critical areas such as testing, curriculum, and school funding to a newly established Department of Education and Workforce, which is headed by an official appointed by the governor. Consequently, the board’s remaining responsibilities are now limited to overseeing teacher licensing and investigating educator misconduct, alongside the selection of Ohio’s teacher of the year.
While the House’s proposition aimed to streamline governance within education, many remain sceptical about the implications such changes would have for public education in Ohio. The idea to consolidate power under a governor-appointed body is seen by some as a move toward centralisation that could undermine local school districts’ ability to effectively address their unique needs.
Lawmakers in Ohio are racing against a deadline, with the state budget needing final approval by July 1. As the situation develops, it remains uncertain what adjustments will be made to reconcile differing views on education governance. The ongoing debate not only highlights the fractured political landscape surrounding education in Ohio but also raises critical questions about the balance of authority and accountability in shaping the future of public schooling across the state.
Anna Staver, who covers state government and politics for Cleveland.com/The Plain Dealer, reports that these developments are reflective of a larger shift in educational policy that is already redefining how K-12 education is administrated in Ohio. Moreover, the Senate's recent approval of a budget nearing $86 billion suggests that significant changes—not just to the school board’s makeup but to K-12 funding and policy—are likely afoot, further complicating the landscape for education in the state.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is recent, with the latest developments reported in early June 2025. However, similar discussions and proposals regarding the reduction of the State Board of Education have been reported since April 2025. ([ohiocapitaljournal.com](https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2025/04/15/ohio-house-budget-would-cut-all-elected-members-of-the-state-board-of-education-limit-board-to-five/?utm_source=openai)) The article includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. Additionally, the article references a press release from Anna Staver, a reporter for Cleveland.com/The Plain Dealer, which typically warrants a high freshness score. ([foxnews.com](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-budget-plan-clears-state-senate?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The direct quote from Teresa Fedor, "I’m worried about not having enough teaching experience on that board to make the serious decisions," appears to be original, with no exact matches found in earlier material. This suggests potentially original or exclusive content. However, the phrasing and content of the quote are consistent with her previous public statements, indicating a possible reuse of content.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from Cleveland.com, a reputable news outlet. However, the article includes references to other sources, such as the Ohio Capital Journal and Fox News, which are also reputable. The inclusion of multiple sources enhances the reliability of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims regarding the Ohio Senate's decision to exclude the House's proposal from the state budget align with recent legislative actions and discussions. The article provides specific details, such as the estimated annual savings of $50,000 and the concerns raised by Teresa Fedor, which are consistent with information from other reputable sources. The tone and language used are appropriate for the topic and region, and the structure of the article is focused on the main issue without excessive or off-topic detail.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent developments regarding the Ohio Senate's decision to exclude the House's proposal to reduce the State Board of Education from the state budget. While the article includes updated data, it recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The direct quote from Teresa Fedor appears to be original, suggesting potentially exclusive content. The narrative is sourced from reputable outlets, enhancing its reliability. The claims made are plausible and consistent with recent legislative actions and discussions. However, the recycling of older material and the potential reuse of content in the quote from Teresa Fedor warrant further scrutiny.