Taxpayers are facing rising costs due to what Conservative politicians describe as “waste and duplication” in the provision of home-to-school transport for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Concerns have been raised about councils not factoring in parents' access to vehicles leased through the Motability scheme when arranging transport support for SEND children. This issue points to inefficiencies that may be driving up public expenditure unnecessarily.
Recent research from the Local Government Association (LGA) highlights the scale of the challenge, with council spending on SEND home-to-school transport expected to near £2 billion by 2025/26. This represents a staggering 200% increase compared to a decade earlier. The average cost per child for this provision stands around £8,900 annually. The rise is attributed partly to a 40% growth in the number of SEND pupils needing transport and longer journey distances due to limited local special school placements, which often necessitate travel further afield.
The Motability scheme, which allows individuals receiving certain disability benefits to lease vehicles, plays a significant role in this context. In 2024-25, more than £3 billion in benefits supported the scheme, which currently offers an all-inclusive vehicle leasing package covering insurance, servicing, and maintenance. This package is reportedly at least 45% more affordable than equivalent market options, protecting disabled individuals from rising motoring costs amid economic pressures.
Despite these benefits, the government’s stance, as articulated by the education minister Georgia Gould, is that a child’s eligibility for free travel support is not diminished by any additional benefits or allowances received by their parents, including the higher rate mobility component that may facilitate Motability vehicle leasing. The decision-making process on whether to consider Motability scheme access when assessing transport requests for young people in post-16 education falls to local authorities, without central guidance enforcing a uniform approach.
Shadow communities minister David Simmonds has questioned whether officials have provided any guidance to local councils on this matter, highlighting the potential for duplicated funding or inefficient service delivery. The lack of a mandated assessment of vehicle availability through Motability when arranging school transport could lead to situations where taxpayers are subsidising transport already accessible to families, raising concerns over the prudent use of public funds.
The broader context around the Motability scheme indicates ongoing efforts to refine its offerings and support models for disabled people. Recent updates include the extension of a £750 New Vehicle Payment to assist new customers acquiring vehicles through the scheme, a move designed to make vehicle access more affordable. Furthermore, the Motability Foundation’s policy work envisages reforms that improve employment and social engagement opportunities for disabled individuals by enhancing the accessibility of transport options.
In sum, rising costs in SEND transport are creating significant pressure on public finances, with calls for greater efficiency and coordination between schemes like Motability and local authority provisions. The government’s current position leaves considerable discretion to local bodies, potentially perpetuating financial overlaps that could be better managed. With council spending set to increase further, clarity and strategic guidance may be necessary to ensure that taxpayer money is directed toward genuinely additional support where it is most needed.
📌 Reference Map:
- [1] (Express) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6
- [2] (Local Government Association) - Paragraph 2, Paragraph 7
- [3] (Motability News) - Paragraph 5
- [6] (Motability Scheme News) - Paragraph 3
- [4] (Motability Foundation Green Paper) - Paragraph 5
- [7] (Motability Foundation Document) - Paragraph 5
Source: Noah Wire Services