The UK’s textile waste management landscape is facing an existential crisis, according to a recent warning from WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme). If the sector collapses, the financial burden of dealing with unwanted textiles will inevitably fall on charities, local authorities, and consumers. WRAP estimates that the fallout could add £64 million in annual gate fees to the existing £73 million already incurred by councils for dealing with discarded textiles. This escalation is alarming, especially since the overall cost of managing used textiles in the UK is projected to hit £200 million annually by 2035 if immediate action isn’t taken.
Catherine David, incoming CEO at WRAP, articulates the stakes clearly: “The impact of this sector folding will be catastrophic.” A decreasing number of reusable items has plagued the industry, leading many recycling businesses to operate at a loss. "Generating and increasing the value of our worn-out clothing must be fast-tracked if the industry is to be salvaged," David added, emphasising the urgency for innovation in textile recycling.
The crux of the issue lies in a confluence of factors. Nearly half of used textiles in the UK—around 35 items per person annually—are disposed of in general waste bins. This trend is partially driven by the proliferation of low-quality fast fashion, resulting in a staggering 57.5% decline in value for collected textiles over the past decade. Such a sharp drop not only hampers charitable organisations but also strains local authorities’ budgets, forcing them to struggle between escalating landfill fees and incineration costs.
In response, WRAP has identified three avenues for salvaging the textile recycling sector: advanced automated sorting, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), and a reimagined approach to retailer take-back schemes. The ACT UK project, which involves 18 partners from various segments of the textile value chain, seeks to establish advanced sorting facilities. Such centres would create a more efficient pathway for reprocessing textiles, thereby reducing landfill contributions significantly.
Recent trials by WRAP indicate that public engagement is essential for recycling initiatives. During ACT UK’s collection efforts, an impressive 46% increase in textile donations was reported when the public had a chance to contribute worn-out items alongside those in better condition. This data reinforces the argument for a structured and well-supported recycling initiative.
Support for the EPR scheme has gained significant traction across the textile industry, but it is clear that this cannot be the sole strategy for overcoming current challenges. Collaborative approaches are being explored, including building a network of 25,000-ton capacity recycling facilities and co-designing effective retailer take-back schemes.
The reality is stark: as low-quality fast fashion dominates and warehouse stock overflows, the UK’s economy could face a potential £200 million annual loss due to the lack of effective textile waste management. Urgent government intervention is necessary to avert further environmental degradation and to stimulate a sustainable framework for the entire textile sector.
Support for an eco-modulated EPR scheme, which is already gaining attention in various regions globally, could incentivise sustainable design practices and bolster recycling capabilities. WRAP plans to partner with leading brands to establish a robust EPR framework within the next year, facilitating the necessary structural change to make the UK textile sector more sustainable.
With a public increasingly aware and willing to recycle, WRAP’s vision of a circular economy for textiles seems both feasible and essential. However, this can only be achieved through coordinated efforts among all stakeholders involved—charities, local authorities, retailers, and consumers must align their goals towards a more sustainable textile ecosystem.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services