A new report warns that by the late 2020s, two-thirds of UK workers could endure conditions over 35°C, highlighting a regulatory gap as the UK lacks maximum workplace temperature laws. Autonomy calls for urgent legislation to mandate work stoppages above 27°C alongside practical protections to safeguard employee health as heatwaves grow more frequent and intense.
The escalating frequency and severity of extreme heatwaves pose a significant threat to the health and safety of the UK workforce, a concern articulated in a recent report by Autonomy, a think tank focused on empowering democracy and economic reform. This report reveals alarming forecasts: by the end of the 2020s, approximately two-thirds of the UK's labour force could be forced to work in conditions exceeding 35°C. In a worst-case scenario, more than 99% of the workforce may encounter extreme heat events during the latter part of the 21st century.
Despite these troubling projections, UK legislation lacks specific guidelines regarding workplace temperatures, failing to set a minimum or maximum threshold. Autonomy's recommendations aim to address this legislative oversight, notably by proposing an adverse working temperature threshold of 27°C, which would mandate a cessation of work activities beyond this limit. In contrast to the UK, many countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Spain, and Cyprus, already impose legal maximums for working temperatures, which can serve as valuable precedents for UK policymakers.
The report emphasises that, presently, UK law requires only that employers ensure a "reasonable" working temperature. Current guidelines specify minimum indoor temperatures of 16°C or 13°C for demanding physical labour but do not impose legal limits on upper temperatures. This regulatory gap is concerning, especially in light of findings from organisations like Acas that highlight employers' duty of care in creating a comfortable working environment. These guidelines advocate for health and safety risk assessments and adjustments to work practices to counteract the adverse effects of high temperatures.
Moreover, there is an increasing international recognition of the importance of regulating maximum workplace temperatures. Following recent extreme weather events, countries like Greece and the United States have begun to adopt temporary measures aimed at mitigating the risks associated with workplace heat. Such initiatives may not only outline immediate steps for employee protection but may also spur broader shifts in public policy regarding climate adaptation.
With the Trades Union Congress (TUC) championing a campaign for a week of action focused on workplace temperature regulations, there is a growing call for systematic change in how the UK addresses the realities of climate change for employees. Recommendations from the report call for practical measures: providing adequate shelter, ensuring regular breaks, and considering work stoppages during extreme heat periods. This comprehensive approach reflects a proactive stance towards scaffolding worker health and safety against the formidable backdrop of climate change.
As the workforce grapples with the implications of increasing temperatures, there is a consensus that governmental action is essential. Workers in sectors increasingly exposed to the elements will require robust protections to navigate the challenges posed by soaring temperatures. The necessity for a structured response to heat in the workplace is not just urgent; it is a crucial aspect of adapting workplace policies to safeguard workers' health in a changing climate.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The report was published on 29 May 2025, making it current. The narrative presents new findings and policy recommendations, indicating originality. However, similar concerns about heat-related risks to UK workers have been discussed in previous reports, such as the Alex Ferry Foundation's 'Left Out in the Sun' report. ([ferryfoundation.org.uk](https://ferryfoundation.org.uk/report/left-out-in-the-sun/?utm_source=openai)) This suggests that while the specific findings are new, the broader issue has been previously addressed. Additionally, the report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No significant discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The report includes direct quotes from the Autonomy Institute, which are unique to this publication. No identical quotes were found in earlier material, indicating originality. The wording of the quotes matches the original source, with no variations noted.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Institute of Employment Rights (IER), a reputable organisation known for its research on employment rights. However, the IER is not as widely recognised as some other institutions, which may affect the perceived reliability. The Autonomy Institute, cited in the report, is a think tank focused on democracy and economic reform, which adds credibility to the findings. No unverifiable entities or fabricated information were identified.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims made in the narrative are plausible and supported by existing research on the impact of extreme heat on the UK workforce. The report's findings align with previous studies, such as those by the Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment, which have highlighted similar concerns. ([lse.ac.uk](https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/improving-the-resilience-of-the-uk-labour-force-in-a-1-5c-world/?utm_source=openai)) The language and tone are consistent with typical policy reports, and the structure is focused on the main claim without excessive or off-topic detail. No inconsistencies in language or tone were noted.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative presents current and original findings from a reputable source, with direct quotes unique to this publication. While similar concerns have been addressed in previous reports, the specific data and policy recommendations are new. The claims are plausible and supported by existing research, with no significant issues identified in source reliability or plausibility.