A United Nations University report reveals that increasing wildfires fueled by climate change are turning forests into net carbon emitters, challenging the effectiveness of current forest-based climate strategies and voluntary carbon markets.
The climate strategy of relying on forests as carbon sinks is under increasing scrutiny, particularly in light of a new report from the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH). This report argues that decades of efforts to plant trees and preserve forests might be exacerbating climate change due to heightened wildfires transforming these vital ecosystems into significant carbon emitters.
Historically, forests have been hailed as crucial allies in the fight against climate change, capable of absorbing substantial amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, recent developments challenge this notion. The report highlights an alarming trend: wildfires, notably in places like Canada, Australia, and the Amazon, are exploding in size and frequency. For instance, the wildfires that swept through Canada this year emitted more greenhouse gases than industrial outputs from any nation, apart from China and India, according to Ju Hyoung Lee, a research fellow at UNU and the report’s lead author, speaking from Seoul. This shift raises critical questions about the effectiveness of existing carbon offset programs, many of which rely heavily on the voluntary carbon market—a largely unregulated realm currently facing heightened scrutiny over its efficacy and integrity.
These wildfires serve not just as immediate ecological disasters but also signal a more profound systemic failure in how climate policies are constructed. The report argues that current efforts often overlook the reality that changing climate conditions are rendering many historical fire assessments obsolete. Lee pointed out that while organisations like Verra, which certifies carbon projects, typically reference past fire records to gauge risk, these do not reflect the increased frequencies and intensities of recent fires. This can lead to tragic miscalculations as more trees are planted with the aim of trapping carbon, ironically resulting in a greater risk of emissions due to future wildfires.
Kaveh Madani, director of the UNU-INWEH, emphasised the urgency for reform in how forest carbon projects are approached. He underscored that not all initiatives in the voluntary carbon market contribute to wildfire risks, but many existing certifications rely on outdated science. As the environment shifts, with factors such as rainfall patterns, soil health, and increasing droughts coming into play, these projects need to be reevaluated.
Indeed, the report calls for a comprehensive reassessment of what qualifies as sustainable forest management. It proposes integrating satellite data to monitor growing forests and fuel accumulation closely, thereby identifying areas that may pose wildfire risks. Madani iterated that this focus on real-time data is crucial for crafting informed strategies aimed at reducing carbon emissions without inadvertently aggravating the wildfire threat.
Global responses to these findings are critical. The United Nations has long warned about the rising risks associated with wildfires, urging integrated strategies to safeguard forests, climate, and broader sustainability efforts. This collective urgency highlights the need for coordinated global action against the escalating wildfire threat posed to our ecosystems, biodiversity, and ultimately human health.
In conclusion, as the dynamics of forests change under the stress of climate change, the strategies that once seemed effective require urgent rethinking. The ongoing dialogue about these issues will shape the future of climate policy and the reliance on forests as a cornerstone of our efforts to combat greenhouse gas emissions.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is based on a recent report from the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), published on 6 May 2025. ([unu.edu](https://unu.edu/inweh/news/frequent-large-scale-wildfires-are-turning-forests-carbon-sinks-super-emitters?utm_source=openai)) The Scientific American article referencing this report was published on 6 June 2025, indicating timely reporting. No evidence of recycled or outdated content was found. The report's findings are novel, highlighting the unintended consequences of current forest carbon offset programs. The inclusion of updated data on recent wildfires adds to the report's freshness. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The narrative does not appear to be republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The reliance on a recent press release from a reputable UN-affiliated institution warrants a high freshness score.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
Direct quotes from Dr. Ju Hyoung Lee and Professor Kaveh Madani in the Scientific American article match those in the original UNU-INWEH report, indicating accurate reporting. No evidence of reused or misquoted content was found. The consistency of the quotes across sources supports the credibility of the reporting.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), a reputable UN-affiliated institution. The Scientific American article references this report, further corroborating the information. No unverifiable entities or fabricated information were identified. The use of a press release from a reputable UN-affiliated institution enhances the reliability of the source.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The report's claim that current forest carbon offset programs may inadvertently increase carbon emissions due to heightened wildfire risks is plausible and aligns with recent studies on the impact of climate change on wildfire frequency and intensity. The narrative is consistent with existing literature on the challenges of forest-based carbon sequestration in the context of climate change. The language and tone are appropriate for the topic and region, with no inconsistencies noted. The report provides specific details, including data on recent wildfires and their emissions, supporting the plausibility of the claims.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is based on a recent, reputable report from the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, published on 6 May 2025. The reporting is timely, with the Scientific American article referencing this report published on 6 June 2025. Direct quotes from the report are accurately reproduced, and the source is reliable. The claims made are plausible and supported by recent studies on the impact of climate change on wildfire frequency and intensity. No evidence of recycled content, misquoted information, or unverifiable entities was found. The narrative provides specific details, including data on recent wildfires and their emissions, supporting the plausibility of the claims. The language and tone are appropriate for the topic and region, with no inconsistencies noted. Given these factors, the overall assessment is a PASS with high confidence.
