Incident of Mixed Signals: A British Airways Boeing 777 Caught Fire During Take-Off
In a remarkable and alarming incident that raises questions about cockpit protocols, a British Airways Boeing 777 experienced a fire caused by an inadvertent mix-up of left and right by the co-pilot. On June 28, 2024, during its take-off from London Gatwick Airport bound for Vancouver, the situation escalated to a rejected take-off, necessitating a high-speed emergency stop after the aircraft reached significant speeds of over 190 mph.
According to a recently released report by the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB), the mishap was classified as an 'action slip.' As the aircraft was rolling down the runway, the co-pilot mistakenly pulled back on the thrust lever with his right hand instead of using his left. This mistake led to the brakes overheating, which in turn ignited a fire in the main wheel brakes on the right side of the aircraft. Fortunately, no injuries were reported among the 13 crew members and 334 passengers, although the fire had to be extinguished by the airport's fire crew.
The co-pilot, who had a commendable flying record with over 6,000 hours of experience, attributed his confusion to an unidentifiable reason. Despite being well-rested and having recently returned from a period of annual leave, he expressed surprise at his error, indicating that the incident was unusual even for a seasoned pilot.
The event caused significant disruptions at Gatwick, leading to a temporary closure of the runway and the cancellation of at least 23 flights. A spokesperson for Gatwick Airport stated that the fire service acted quickly to manage the emergency and that safety remained their top priority throughout the incident. Passengers aboard the flight reported alarming scenes as fire engines arrived at the aircraft shortly after the aborted take-off, underscoring the urgency of the situation.
This incident is not isolated within the framework of aviation mishaps. Previous reports illustrate that British Airways has faced challenges involving Boeing 777 aircraft, including an engine fire at Las Vegas McCarran International Airport in 2015, which required an emergency evacuation of passengers. In contrast to this recent incident, the crew at that time was commended for their calm and competent handling of the emergency, showcasing the critical importance of training and response protocols in aviation safety.
Moreover, just a few weeks before the Gatwick event, another British Airways Boeing 777 had to return to New York's JFK Airport shortly after take-off due to fumes in the cockpit. These instances highlight the various challenges that can arise for flight crews, even in seemingly routine operations.
Safety procedures in aviation necessitate vigilant oversight, extensive training, and rapid response capabilities to manage unforeseen complications. As travel experts note, such incidents, while alarming, allow for vital lessons to be learnt and for protocols to be evaluated and improved. As passenger safety remains paramount, outcomes from investigations like the AAIB's help inform future practices to reduce risks and enhance confidence among travellers.
While the British Airways incident may reflect a momentary lapse in judgment under pressure, it also serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in aviation, where even experienced pilots must navigate the dual challenges of operational procedures and human error.
Reference Map:
- Paragraph 1 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490), [[2]](https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2024/06/28/british-airways-777-rejected-takeoff-closed-gatwick-airport/)
- Paragraph 2 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490), [[2]](https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2024/06/28/british-airways-777-rejected-takeoff-closed-gatwick-airport/)
- Paragraph 3 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490), [[3]](https://airlive.net/news/2024/06/28/breaking-london-gatwick-closed-following-british-airways-boeing-777-ba2279-rejected-take-off/)
- Paragraph 4 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490), [[5]](https://www.inkl.com/news/british-airways-fire-pilots-praised-for-textbook-response-to-worst-nightmare)
- Paragraph 5 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490), [[6]](https://simpleflying.com/british-airways-boeing-777-cockpit-fumes-jfk-return/)
- Paragraph 6 – [[1]](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14692501/British-Airways-plane-caught-fire-pilot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490)
Source: Noah Wire Services