Preparing the nets aboard the Amethyst trawler in Brixham harbour, Wesley Loveland embodies the frustration of many in the UK fishing industry regarding the latest deal between the UK and the European Union. “It’s a disaster,” Loveland declares, expressing his discontent over what he perceives as a betrayal of British fishermen for the sake of more trivial negotiations, like access to pet passports.

The new agreement, lauded by Prime Minister Keir Starmer as a “win-win” for both sides, aims to usher in a "new era" in UK-EU relations. It permits more British travellers to use e-gates when travelling to Europe and streamlines access for farmers to trade their products on the continent. Yet, amidst these advances lies a contentious element: European fishing trawlers have been granted an extension of 12 years to access British waters, a move that has triggered outrage across the fishing communities.

Loveland, who primarily catches Dover sole, believes that the government squandered an opportunity to negotiate tougher terms for UK fishers. “The fish in these waters are worth billions to the French and others,” says Loveland, suggesting that the industry could have provided significant leverage in discussions on immigration or other vital issues. He recalls the divisive atmosphere reminiscent of the Brexit turmoil. “When Brexit was going through, it was stressful… it’s really divisive,” he notes, revealing the emotional toll on those who have worked in this industry for years.

On the flip side, the deal offers potential benefits for exports, with the government asserting that fish caught in British waters can now be sold to the EU without veterinary checks—an important cost-saving measure. Ian Perkes, a fish merchant with decades of experience in Brixham harbour, welcomes the prospect of reduced red tape, even as specifics of the implementation remain unclear. He voices concern over the dire state of fish exports since Brexit, which have plummeted by 20% due to new regulatory barriers that have suffocated trade. Perkes recounts the heartache of witnessing significant losses linked to strict border checks, citing experiences where simple errors led to the destruction of valuable consignments.

Despite the potential gains in trade, the fishing community remains sceptical. Paul Dyer, another veteran in the industry, articulated a prevailing sentiment of betrayal among fishermen, arguing that extending EU access means diminished income for local fishers. “They are all the same. Conservative. Labour. It doesn’t matter,” he remarks, highlighting a pervasive disenchantment with political promises.

Kyle Evans, a long-time fisherman, added to this pessimism, feeling that the deal merely represents “business as usual.” He sensed that political manoeuvring was simply generating sensational stories rather than delivering meaningful change for his industry. This despair is echoed across the sector, reflecting a sense of abandonment amid attempts to balance broader economic interests with local needs.

Critically, while parts of the food industry have celebrated the alleviation of bureaucratic hassles, voices like Elspeth Macdonald from the Scottish Fishermen's Federation have described the fishing terms as a “horror show.” Ultimately, the agreement, while framed as a step towards renewed cooperation, illustrates the complex tensions inherent in negotiating post-Brexit relations. It cleverly navigates the fine line between economic pragmatism and the safeguarding of national interests, though not without significant backlash from those directly affected.

As the dust settles from this latest agreement, the fishing industry is left grappling with a precarious future, caught between the aspirations of a government seeking to improve trade relations and the stark realities confronting local fishermen who feel their voices have been drowned out in the tumult of political compromise.

Reference Map

Source: Noah Wire Services