A UN panel has urged the United Kingdom to reconsider its recently signed agreement that transfers sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, citing a significant lack of provisions to protect the rights of the Chagossian people. This agreement, signed last month, allows Mauritius to reclaim the archipelago while the UK retains control of Diego Garcia, the largest island, where a pivotal military base operates in collaboration with the United States. The panel of independent experts, appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, stated that the deal does not guarantee the Chagossians' right to resettle on their ancestral lands. They noted that continued military operations on Diego Garcia hinder the Chagossians’ ability to access the land from which they were forcibly removed.

The UK Foreign Office has highlighted that the deal has received backing from international figures, including the UN Secretary-General, claiming it heralds a new chapter in the relationship between the UK and Mauritius. However, the panel's assertion implies that this relationship may come at the cost of historical injustices faced by the Chagossians, who were uprooted from their homes in the 1960s to facilitate the establishment of the military base. The UK purchased the islands for £3 million in 1968, but the legitimacy of that transaction has been contested by Mauritius, which maintains that the islands were taken under duress as part of negotiations for independence.

Furthermore, recent developments show that criticism surrounds this agreement not only among the displaced Chagossians but internationally, as it raises concerns over regional security dynamics. Observers note that the deal has come under scrutiny from critics who fear it could potentially compromise the UK and US's strategic military interests in the Indian Ocean, especially in light of China's expanding influence in the region. Some experts suggest that the Labour government may have expedited the agreement to secure its position before potential shifts in US administration could alter geopolitical alignments.

Chagossians in the UK have expressed outrage regarding their exclusion from discussions about their future; there are burgeoning calls for greater involvement in the negotiation process. Plans for protests in London have emerged, signalling their intent to assert a claim not only for the right to return but also for a referendum on the sovereignty issue. Speaking to the press, Chagossian leaders highlighted their community's historical struggles, asserting that any resolution must consider their voices as central to the transition.

Despite the controversy that surrounds the agreement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has vowed to move forward, asserting the deal’s long-term benefits for international security and historical reconciliation. Earlier negotiations had begun under the previous administration, but recent political shifts prompted renewed urgency to finalise terms. However, opposition remains within the UK, reflecting apprehensions that surrendering sovereignty, even partially, risks opposing national interest and the well-being of the Chagossians.

The geopolitical ramifications of this agreement continue to unfold, with critiques highlighting the broader implications of colonial legacies and the right to self-determination. The final outcomes remain uncertain, with ongoing dialogue expected between the parties involved and increased scrutiny from international human rights advocates.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services