The Bank of England’s recent shift towards a more accommodating stance on stablecoins marks a significant change in its regulatory approach and has sparked debate on whether this reflects a newfound belief in the technology or an attempt to align with the US financial agenda. Stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to traditional currencies like the US dollar, have been touted as a potential catalyst for more efficient international payments, though they have also faced criticism for their role in facilitating illicit activities.
Two years ago, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey was dismissive of stablecoins, stating that they did not meet the standards expected of safe money, a view largely echoed by other global regulators. However, following President Donald Trump’s high praise of stablecoins as a revolutionary financial technology during his recent UK state visit, the Bank’s posture has notably softened. This includes a willingness to consider acting as a ‘lender of last resort’ for sterling stablecoin issuers, a move that marks a dramatic shift from previous scepticism. Whether this represents genuine institutional confidence or simply an act of deference to American influence remains a topic of speculation.
In November 2025, the Bank proposed a regulatory framework designed to balance innovation with financial stability as it prepares for the UK's stablecoin regime launch in 2026. Rather than requiring issuers to back stablecoins entirely with assets held at the Bank, as had been earlier suggested, the Bank now permits stablecoin issuers to hold up to 60% of their backing assets in short-term UK government debt. The remaining 40% must still be held with the Bank of England, but no interest will be earned on these reserves. This regulatory flexibility aims to ease operational constraints on issuers and better support the fledgling market.
Alongside asset backing rules, the Bank is implementing temporary holding caps on stablecoin balances to prevent risks such as rapid outflows which could destabilise traditional bank deposits during the initial adoption phase. These caps limit individual holdings to £20,000 and business holdings to £10 million, though there is provision to exempt businesses that require larger balances, including crypto exchanges and retail chains. According to the Bank, these limits are transitional and are expected to be relaxed or removed once the market matures and risks subside.
The proposals draw on lessons from recent financial turmoil, including the 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the USDC de-pegging event, which exposed vulnerabilities in financial infrastructures tied to digital assets. Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden warned that any further dilution of the regulations could jeopardise UK financial stability, potentially triggering a credit crunch. Her caution underscores the delicate balance regulators must strike between fostering innovation and protecting the financial system from systemic risks.
While some cryptocurrency advocacy groups have criticised the holding limits as impractical, the Bank of England has emphasised its commitment to managing risk carefully without stifling innovation. The public consultation on the proposed rules will remain open until February 2026, with final regulations expected to be published later that year. This measured approach reflects an attempt to integrate stablecoins into the UK's financial ecosystem while safeguarding against the types of financial shocks that have recently rocked markets globally.
This policy evolution comes amid broader reflections on economic challenges in the UK, where rising unemployment and public sector wage pressures paint a challenging backdrop for economic policy. Meanwhile, the opulence of London’s financial elite and shifting fortunes among the wealthiest families highlight ongoing contrasts in economic fortunes. The Bank of England’s cautious yet pragmatic approach to regulating stablecoins thus fits into a wider narrative of navigating modern financial disruptions and geopolitical influences.
📌 Reference Map:
- [1] (The Spectator) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 8
- [2] (Reuters) - Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6
- [3] (Reuters) - Paragraph 4
- [4] (Bank of England) - Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6
- [5] (Yahoo Finance) - Paragraph 5
- [6] (Yahoo Finance) - Paragraph 5
- [7] (Skadden) - Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6
Source: Noah Wire Services