Following a recent attack on a teenage girl, Havering councillor David Taylor criticises the council for neglecting vital safety measures and letting millions in community funds lie unused amid rising crime and failing CCTV coverage.
Following the recent attack on a 15-year-old girl in Romford, Havering councillor David Taylor has issued a stark warning about the evident failures of local authorities to protect vulnerable residents. Instead of prioritising meaningful safety measures, the council continues to drag its feet, with unspent community infrastructure levy (CIL) funds sitting idle while incidents like this happen far too often. The community’s calls for expanded CCTV coverage—particularly in high-risk areas such as underground subways—have been largely ignored, illustrating a complacency that borders on neglect.
Taylor highlighted the alarming deterioration in safety conditions, pointing out that approximately a third of the borough’s CCTV cameras—23 out of 72—are out of order, rendering surveillance efforts ineffective when most needed. The tragic incident underscores the urgent need to reallocate the £8.2 million in unspent CIL funds, much of which remains unallocated despite clear community demands. It’s a stark example of how financial mismanagement and misplaced priorities hinder real progress in our town’s safety.
While council leader Ray Morgon touts ongoing safety initiatives, such as a £3 million upgrade to the CCTV network—including a new control room—these measures are reactive at best. Despite these investments, recent figures reveal that violent and sexual offences in Romford continue to rise, with April recording 81 such crimes—a clear indication that existing systems are failing to serve their purpose. Anti-social behaviour has also surged dramatically, yet meaningful action, such as full coverage of all surveillance points or community-led initiatives, remains elusive.
Councillor Taylor’s calls extend beyond just street surveillance; he advocates for safer parks, including petitions for locked park gates after hours and additional CCTV at their entrances—proposals that are common-sense solutions ignored by a council seemingly more interested in box-ticking than effective crime prevention. Residents, especially mothers, express genuine concern for their children’s safety walking home at night, yet the response remains underwhelming and insufficient.
Adding political pressure, the recent election results have only highlighted how out of touch the current administration remains with community safety needs. Instead of addressing the root causes of rising crime, the ruling coalition appears to prioritise political messaging over tangible actions—allocating funds to show faces rather than fix the broken infrastructure that promotes crime. As former political figures and advocates for change have pointed out, genuine community safety requires a real overhaul, increased funding for neighbourhood policing, and a clear commitment to utilising existing resources effectively.
The recent crime summit may have acknowledged some safety concerns, but the fact remains that the borough’s crime rates are climbing, and residents are losing faith in these so-called safety initiatives. Without a proportional and swift response—such as fully repairing and expanding CCTV networks, locking down public spaces after hours, and properly funding local law enforcement—Romford’s residents risk continued vulnerability and a dangerous sense of abandonment.
It is high time that local authorities stop empty promises and start implementing the meaningful, immediate measures necessary to keep our streets safe from the scourge of crime. The community deserves far more than the token gestures and half-hearted policies that currently dominate Havering’s approach to public safety.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative appears to be original, with no exact matches found in recent publications. The earliest related content is from February 2025, discussing Councillor David Taylor's petition for safer parks and CCTV expansion. ([thehaveringdaily.co.uk](https://thehaveringdaily.co.uk/2025/02/14/romford-councillor-launches-petition-for-safer-parks-and-closing-gates/?utm_source=openai)) The report includes updated data on CCTV upgrades and recent crime statistics, indicating a high freshness score. However, the lack of coverage in other reputable outlets raises some concerns. The absence of a direct link to the original article makes it challenging to verify the specifics of the attack. Additionally, the report's tone and language are consistent with typical council communications, suggesting authenticity. Nonetheless, the lack of corroboration from other sources warrants caution.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The direct quotes attributed to Councillor David Taylor and Council Leader Ray Morgon are consistent with their known positions and previous statements. For instance, Councillor Taylor has previously advocated for safer parks and CCTV expansion. ([thehaveringdaily.co.uk](https://thehaveringdaily.co.uk/2025/02/14/romford-councillor-launches-petition-for-safer-parks-and-closing-gates/?utm_source=openai)) Council Leader Morgon has also emphasized the importance of community safety and the role of CCTV in crime prevention. ([havering.gov.uk](https://www.havering.gov.uk/news/article/1522/where-we-live-cctv-%E2%80%93-the-eyes-of-the-borough?utm_source=openai)) The consistency of these quotes with their prior statements supports their authenticity.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The report originates from Yellow Advertiser, a local news outlet. While it provides detailed coverage of local issues, its reach and reputation are more limited compared to national media. The lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets raises some concerns about the report's reliability. However, the detailed information and consistency with known facts lend some credibility to the source.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The claims regarding the attack on a 15-year-old girl in Romford and the subsequent calls for increased CCTV funding are plausible and align with ongoing local discussions about community safety. For example, Councillor Taylor has previously launched a petition for safer parks and CCTV expansion. ([thehaveringdaily.co.uk](https://thehaveringdaily.co.uk/2025/02/14/romford-councillor-launches-petition-for-safer-parks-and-closing-gates/?utm_source=openai)) However, the lack of coverage from other reputable outlets and the absence of a direct link to the original article make it difficult to fully verify the specifics of the incident. The report's tone and language are consistent with typical council communications, suggesting authenticity. Nonetheless, the lack of corroboration from other sources warrants caution.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The report presents a plausible narrative consistent with known facts and statements from local officials. However, the lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets and the absence of a direct link to the original article raise concerns about its reliability. Given these factors, the overall assessment is 'OPEN' with a medium confidence level.