Chancellor Rachel Reeves is embarking on a significant overhaul of the UK's Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) to stimulate greater investment in British equities and support domestic economic growth. Central to her plans is a proposal to require a minimum holding of UK-listed stocks within stocks-and-shares ISAs, potentially drawing on the model of the former personal equity plans (PEPs) that were available until 1999. This initiative aims to redirect savers’ funds from cash deposits—currently dominating ISA contributions—towards equity investments that could bolster the London Stock Exchange and British companies. Alongside this, the Treasury is considering introducing a stamp duty tax break on London-listed shares held within ISAs, reinforcing the tax advantages of these accounts and making UK equities more attractive compared to international stocks that currently face no such levy.

These measures are set to form the most radical adjustments to the ISA framework in over 25 years, reflecting a shift in policy focus toward fostering a stronger UK investment culture. Reeves is also contemplating halving the annual cash ISA allowance from £20,000 to £10,000 or even lower thresholds, encouraging savers to allocate more towards stocks and shares. However, the reduction in cash ISA limits has been delayed, facing pushback from financial institutions and consumer groups who caution about the wider economic implications. Building societies, in particular, warn that lowering the cash allowance could restrict their ability to fund mortgages and loans, potentially raising borrowing costs and hampering housing growth. With over £300 billion currently held in cash ISAs—accounting for 39% of building societies’ savings—a significant cut could disrupt the flow of capital essential for affordable lending.

The government has engaged with financial institutions and industry stakeholders to assess these reforms carefully, with discussions ongoing ahead of the forthcoming Autumn Budget where formal announcements are anticipated. Critics of the cash ISA limit reduction argue that such a policy might deter rather than encourage retail investment by alienating risk-averse savers who rely on cash ISAs for financial resilience. Alternative voices advocate for greater public education and support to build investor confidence, rather than imposing restrictive limits that could introduce confusion and uncertainty.

Experts within the City offer mixed views on the proposed ISA changes. Proponents, including senior figures from wealth management and investment banking, underscore the unfairness of taxing UK shares with stamp duty inside ISAs while exempting foreign equities, suggesting a tax carve-out could promote fairer competition and boost the domestic market. Others emphasise that modest tweaks like removing stamp duty from ISA-held UK shares could achieve substantial retail investing growth for a relatively low cost, estimated around £120 million annually by industry analysts. On the other hand, some caution that reviving proposals from the previous Conservative government—such as a new “Brit Isa” granting additional tax-free allowances exclusively for British companies—may not be the best approach given past criticisms of complexity and limited uptake.

Despite these differing perspectives, Chancellor Reeves has made clear her commitment to “get Britain investing again,” recognising the need for more robust equity participation to fuel economic expansion. This aligns with broader government ambitions articulated during her Spring Statement to simplify the ISA system and revive domestic stock market investment, reinforcing Labour’s electoral pledge to support UK companies through enhanced retail investor involvement.

As the debate continues, the ISA reforms stand as a pivotal component of the UK’s strategy to nurture a culture of investment, balancing the interests of savers, the financial sector, and the wider economy. Whether by adjusting the tax treatment of UK equities or recalibrating cash savings limits, the government’s challenge will be to implement changes that drive growth without disrupting the stability of key financial institutions or alienating everyday savers.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services