Proposed expansion of council tax bands aims to target wealthier homeowners in England’s most expensive properties, as part of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Autumn Budget plans to increase revenue without full revaluation.
Thousands of homeowners in England are poised to face higher council tax bills following proposals that the Treasury is exploring to create new council tax bands targeting more expensive properties. This measure, anticipated to be part of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s forthcoming Autumn Budget, aims to increase revenue without triggering a full-scale revaluation of property values across the country. Officials are understood to be considering introducing additional bands at the upper end of the property value scale, focusing on pricier homes predominantly in London and the South East.
Council tax banding in England has remained unchanged since its introduction in 1991, when properties were valued to determine bands ranging from A to H. The highest existing bracket, Band H, applies to homes valued above £320,001 as of that year. Adjusted for inflation and current market values, this threshold equates to roughly £1.6 million nationwide and approximately £2.1 million within London today. David Fell, lead analyst at estate agency Hamptons, describes the proposal for an additional top band as "one of the fairer and least disruptive property tax reform ideas" currently under discussion. The existing system has faced criticism for being outdated and unfair, as highlighted by think tanks such as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), which advocates for council tax to be revised based on contemporary house prices.
Currently, disparities in council tax payments are stark. For instance, households in the London Borough of Wandsworth with Band D properties pay an average of around £998 annually in council tax despite average property prices topping £750,000. Conversely, in Rutland, East Midlands, Band D households pay over £2,600 despite average property values being significantly lower. This disparity underscores calls for reform to create a fairer system that better reflects current property market realities.
Labour, under Rachel Reeves’s leadership as Chancellor, has ruled out a wholesale revaluation of council tax bands to avoid increasing the tax burden on working people, a stance emphasised during the party’s election campaign. Reeves has reiterated her position against raising taxes on the working population while indicating that wealthier individuals—those with "broad shoulders"—should contribute more. This aligns with the proposed introduction of new tax bands targeting wealthier homeowners without overhauling the system for all property owners.
Beyond council tax adjustments, Chancellor Reeves faces a significant fiscal shortfall estimated between £22 billion and £32 billion, influenced by market turmoil and previous policy reversals. To address this gap, she is reportedly considering a mix of measures including potential changes to VAT rules, the introduction of a wealth tax, freezing income tax thresholds, and increasing capital gains tax. These proposals form part of a broader strategy to bolster public finances while attempting to balance growth and protect living standards.
There are indications that the government seeks to strike a careful balance in the upcoming budget, aiming to fund necessary public services without imposing undue financial pressure on the majority of working households. A Treasury spokesperson emphasised that the Budget would "strike the right balance between making sure that we have enough money to fund our public services while ensuring we can bring growth to boost living standards."
While Wales is set to revalue council tax bands in 2028 and already introduced an additional top band in 2005, England’s approach remains more cautious. The Treasury's consideration to add new bands for the highest-value properties could represent a midway point—raising additional revenue from wealthier homeowners without enacting a full reassessment of all property values, which would be more politically sensitive.
As the Autumn Budget approaches, all eyes will be on Chancellor Reeves’s proposals to determine how the government plans to navigate these fiscal challenges while adhering to its commitments not to raise taxes on working people, maintaining fiscal responsibility, and addressing entrenched imbalances in property taxation.
📌 Reference Map:
- Paragraph 1 – [1], [4]
- Paragraph 2 – [1], [4]
- Paragraph 3 – [1]
- Paragraph 4 – [1], [2]
- Paragraph 5 – [1], [3], [6]
- Paragraph 6 – [2], [4], [5], [7]
- Paragraph 7 – [1], [3], [4]
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative presents recent proposals by Chancellor Rachel Reeves to introduce new council tax bands targeting higher-value properties, particularly in London and the South East. This aligns with discussions from August 2025 regarding potential property tax reforms. ([thenationalnews.com](https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uk/2025/08/19/rachel-reeves-puts-londons-property-market-in-her-pre-budget-crosshairs/?utm_source=openai)) However, similar discussions have been ongoing since at least 2018, indicating that the core concept is not entirely new. ([newstatesman.com](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/is-labour-guarding-real-tax-plans-rachel-reeves-capital-gains?utm_source=openai)) The report includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([standard.co.uk](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/council-tax-bands-rachel-reeves-budget-b1253698.html?utm_source=openai)) Additionally, the report references a 2024 article from The Standard, suggesting that the content may have been republished across multiple outlets. ([standard.co.uk](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/council-tax-bands-rachel-reeves-budget-b1253698.html?utm_source=openai)) This pattern of republishing across low-quality sites or clickbait networks is a concern. The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is from 2018. ([newstatesman.com](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/is-labour-guarding-real-tax-plans-rachel-reeves-capital-gains?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The report includes a direct quote from David Fell, lead analyst at estate agency Hamptons, describing the proposal for an additional top band as "one of the fairer and least disruptive property tax reform ideas". This quote appears to be original and not found in earlier material, suggesting potential originality or exclusivity. However, without access to the full context of the original statement, it's challenging to verify the accuracy and authenticity of the quote.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from Express.co.uk, a publication known for sensationalist reporting. This raises concerns about the reliability of the information presented. The report references a 2024 article from The Standard, which is a more reputable source, but the overall reliance on Express.co.uk diminishes the overall reliability score.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative discusses proposed council tax reforms targeting higher-value properties, particularly in London and the South East. This aligns with ongoing discussions and reports from August 2025 regarding potential property tax reforms. ([thenationalnews.com](https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uk/2025/08/19/rachel-reeves-puts-londons-property-market-in-her-pre-budget-crosshairs/?utm_source=openai)) However, the report lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, which diminishes its credibility. Additionally, the tone and language used in the report are consistent with typical corporate or official language, suggesting a degree of professionalism.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents a proposal for new council tax bands targeting higher-value properties, aligning with ongoing discussions from August 2025. However, the content appears to be recycled from earlier material, with the earliest known publication date from 2018. The reliance on Express.co.uk, a publication known for sensationalist reporting, raises concerns about the reliability of the information. The report includes a direct quote from David Fell, which appears to be original, but without full context, its authenticity cannot be fully verified. The lack of specific factual anchors and the presence of recycled content diminish the overall credibility of the narrative.