Transport for London (TfL) has confirmed plans to withdraw bus route 283, which runs between Hammersmith Bus Station and East Acton, from mid-December, despite significant opposition from local residents, politicians, and key stakeholders. The withdrawal is part of a wider reshaping of bus services in West London designed to reflect shifting passenger demand and to achieve cost savings amid ongoing financial pressures.

The changes will also involve rerouting two other services, routes 72 and N72, to cover the White City Estate along the current 283 route. Although no stops will be missed under the new arrangements, TfL acknowledges that some journey times will increase, prompting concerns about accessibility, especially for vulnerable passengers and those travelling to Hammersmith Hospital. Approximately 75 percent of respondents in a summer consultation opposed the proposals, citing the potential for reduced direct links to critical transport nodes and healthcare facilities. Only 4 percent expressed support for the plans.

Geoff Hobbs, TfL’s Director of Public Transport Service Planning, stated that the modifications are intended to better align services with actual passenger usage patterns, reflecting changing demands. He added that TfL would continue to monitor the network closely to ensure its bus services remain comprehensive and deliver value for money. The consultation report revealed a total of 709 responses, the vast majority from the public, highlighting widespread dissatisfaction. Local groups, Hammersmith and Fulham Council, and the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust voiced strong objections, particularly concerned about the impact on access to Hammersmith Hospital—the Trust emphasising that the hospital's remote location from any Underground station and limited parking make bus access especially important.

To mitigate some of these concerns, TfL has promised to increase the frequency of route 272 in the evenings and boost service on route 72 in the mornings and all day on Sundays. These enhancements are planned for implementation by February, following the December changes. Despite these mitigations, local officials remain deeply concerned. Councillor Florian Chevoppe-Verdier from Hammersmith and Fulham Council criticised the decision as a blow to public transport connectivity in an already isolated part of the borough, warning that the loss of route 283 risks leaving many residents without adequate access to essential services.

Labour MP Andy Slaughter also expressed disappointment, recognising the value of routes 283 and 72 as vital links in the area. He committed to pressing TfL to monitor the new arrangements and enhance service reliability if necessary. Similarly, the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust reiterated its concerns about the impact on patients, visitors, and staff, announcing plans to engage directly with TfL on the matter.

The decision to withdraw route 283 continues a pattern of controversial service changes enacted by TfL in recent years. For example, last year, TfL cut the 414 route between Marble Arch and Putney Bridge despite public opposition. Additionally, in January 2024, services on route 283 had previously been increased on weekends to reduce waiting times, demonstrating attempts to respond to passenger needs before the more recent decision to withdraw the route altogether.

Route 72, which dates back to the 1930s and serves as a key corridor through East Acton, White City, and Shepherd's Bush, will be rerouted to partly replace the withdrawn 283 service. The night equivalent, route N72, will also be adjusted to cover White City Estate, maintaining night-time access in the area. These adjustments are part of TfL's broader efforts to streamline the network and concentrate resources according to evolving travel patterns, but they remain contentious among local communities who fear reduced accessibility and longer travel times.

TfL emphasises its commitment to delivering efficient and financially sustainable bus services, yet the backlash from both the public and elected representatives underscores the delicate balance between operational pragmatism and community needs. The debate highlights ongoing challenges for London's transport planners in maintaining vital local links against the backdrop of tight budgets and shifting passenger behaviours.

📌 Reference Map:

  • Paragraph 1 – [1] (MyLondon), [5] (Shepherd's Bush W12)
  • Paragraph 2 – [1] (MyLondon), [4] (Fandom N72), [7] (Fandom 72)
  • Paragraph 3 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 4 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 5 – [1] (MyLondon), [2] (LBHF)
  • Paragraph 6 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 7 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 8 – [1] (MyLondon), [3] (LBHF), [5] (Shepherd's Bush W12)
  • Paragraph 9 – [1] (MyLondon), [4] (Fandom N72), [7] (Fandom 72)

Source: Noah Wire Services