US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said London has abandoned calls for an Apple backdoor to access encrypted iCloud data following high‑level talks with Washington, a development that follows Apple’s removal of Advanced Data Protection in the UK and raises fresh questions about cross‑border data access and citizen privacy.
Washington/London — Britain has dropped its demand for Apple to provide a backdoor that would have allowed access to encrypted data stored by U.S. users, DNI Tulsi Gabbard said on X on Monday. The claim comes after months of high‑level talks that reportedly involved Washington and London, with President Donald Trump and Vice‑President JD Vance named as participants in the effort. According to the original report, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was in Washington that day to meet Trump and other European leaders to discuss Russia’s war in Ukraine. A British government spokesperson declined to comment on any agreement but stressed that London has long worked with the United States to tackle security threats while protecting the privacy of citizens. Apple did not respond to requests for comment. The background matters: Apple had withdrawn its Advanced Data Protection feature for UK users in February after a UK order seeking backdoor access under the Investigatory Powers Act. Apple has said it would never build such access, while cybersecurity experts warned that any backdoor could be discovered and misused. The company’s position and the security implications have been a persistent point of contention in the cross‑border data dialogue.
The dispute centred on whether UK authorities could compel access to encrypted data in Apple’s iCloud backups and other services under the Investigatory Powers Act or the CLOUD Act, and what that would mean for privacy and security in both countries. Reuters summaries of the U.S. assessment note that officials were examining whether Britain had violated bilateral data‑sharing frameworks by pressing for such access. In addition, observers highlighted that Apple had already removed ADP for UK users in February, a move that underscored the practical consequences of the case for data protection in Britain. The Guardian’s reporting later explained that Apple’s ADP removal shifted more data to standard encryption, which Apple could access with warrants, raising questions about what data remains protected by default encryption and what that implies for cross‑border investigations.
BBC News’s coverage provides a country‑level technical snapshot: Apple’s ADP tool in Britain was no longer offered to new UK customers, with the nine data categories previously covered by ADP reclassified under Standard Data Protection, while 14 categories remained end‑to‑end encrypted by default. iMessage and FaceTime remain protected by end‑to‑end encryption. The Home Office was described as seeking access under the Investigatory Powers Act, a framing that has fuelled ongoing debate about privacy, civil liberties and the handling of cross‑border data. The Guardian’s August coverage adds that officials did not publicly confirm any agreement and emphasises the diplomatic sensitivities surrounding intelligence sharing, with privacy advocates warning that any erosion of encryption standards could have broader security implications.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
6
Notes:
🕰️ Finding: The underlying narrative (that the U.K. issued a technical order asking Apple to enable access to encrypted iCloud data) first appeared in major reporting on 7 February 2025 (The Washington Post). ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
✅ The specific claim that the U.K. has now “dropped” that demand is new on 19 August 2025 and originates with an X post by U.S. DNI Tulsi Gabbard, widely reported the same day. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
⚠️ Reuse/recycling: The August item heavily recycles background material reported in February (Apple’s removal of Advanced Data Protection and the existence of a Technical Capability Notice). That means the narrative is partly recycled rather than wholly new. ([bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/21/apple-removes-advanced-data-protection-tool-uk-government?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
‼️ Age flag: Because materially similar reporting existed months earlier (Feb 2025), this piece is not wholly fresh — it is an update on a long‑running story (≫7 days earlier). ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
✅ Traceability: The central quoted language (“The UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a ‘back door’…”) is traceable to DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s X post on 19 August 2025; that post is the earliest known source of that phrasing. Major outlets reproduced the quote verbatim. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [cnbc.com](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/19/us-spy-chief-gabbard-says-uk-agreed-to-drop-back-door-mandate-for-apple.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
⚠️ Reuse flag: Identical quotes appear across many outlets (wire/press coverage), so the wording is reused content (not exclusive reporting by the Star Advertiser). ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/bd1114c2f8ef5bcbfa7b870c32505e4f?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [cnbc.com](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/19/us-spy-chief-gabbard-says-uk-agreed-to-drop-back-door-mandate-for-apple.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
‼️ Originality caveat: Because the quote is from a named official’s social post, it is verifiable and not anonymous — raising credibility for the quote itself — but it should be considered a single‑source claim until corroborated by the U.K. government. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
✅ Strengths: The narrative is reported by multiple reputable outlets (Washington Post, BBC, The Guardian, AP, CNBC, Al Jazeera) and quotes a named official (DNI Tulsi Gabbard), which increases traceability and accountability. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/21/apple-removes-advanced-data-protection-tool-uk-government?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/bd1114c2f8ef5bcbfa7b870c32505e4f?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
⚠️ Weaknesses: The U.K. Home Office has not publicly confirmed the withdrawal of the order in the same terms; several outlets report the Home Office declined to comment. That reliance on a single side’s announcement (a U.S. official) creates an asymmetric evidential base. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
‼️ Distribution note: The story has also been republished across tabloids and lower‑quality outlets alongside reputable press — flag for editors that copy may amplify political framing or exaggeration. ([nypost.com](https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/us-news/jd-vance-leads-effort-to-block-uk-from-accessing-us-apple-user-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [aljazeera.com](https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/8/19/uk-drops-mandate-for-apple-back-door-us-spy-chief-says?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
✅ Plausibility: The claim is plausible and consistent with established facts: (a) the U.K. issued a Technical Capability Notice earlier in 2025; (b) Apple removed ADP for U.K. users in February; and (c) U.S. officials (and lawmakers) had publicly objected — all documented by major reporting. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/21/apple-removes-advanced-data-protection-tool-uk-government?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
⚠️ Missing detail: Key specifics are not provided publicly — e.g. whether the U.K. formally withdrew the notice, narrowed its scope, or reached a private diplomatic understanding — so the practical implications remain unclear. That absence of concrete, independently verifiable detail reduces evidentiary certainty. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
‼️ Red‑flag items: Political sensitivity and potential diplomatic bargaining create incentives for partial or strategic disclosures; lack of U.K. confirmation and absence of documents or legal notifications suggests prudence in accepting the headline claim at face value. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
⚠️ Summary judgement: The claim that the U.K. “dropped” its demand that Apple build a backdoor is credible but incomplete. Major reputable outlets confirm that DNI Tulsi Gabbard publicly said the U.K. agreed to drop the mandate on 19 August 2025 (traceable to her X post), and the contested background (the U.K. technical notice and Apple’s removal of ADP) was reported in February 2025. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
‼️ Major risks: (1) The assertion currently rests primarily on a single U.S. official’s public post without a matching, detailed confirmation from the U.K. Home Office or a released legal instrument — this leaves room for ambiguity about scope and implementation; (2) the piece recycles earlier reporting (Feb 2025) so it is an update rather than wholly new reporting; (3) the story has been republished widely, including by lower‑quality outlets, increasing the chance of framing bias or spin. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/19/uk-apple-backdoor-data-privacy-gabbard/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [nypost.com](https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/us-news/jd-vance-leads-effort-to-block-uk-from-accessing-us-apple-user-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
✅ What editors should do next: Seek a direct statement or documentary confirmation from the U.K. Home Office or Apple (official spokespeople / legal filings), and if possible publish the exact X post text and timestamp for transparency. Until the U.K.’s position is publicly documented, label the claim as a government‑to‑government announcement reported by the U.S. intelligence chief and treat operational details as provisional. 🛑