Daniel Day, 29, has pleaded not guilty after allegedly climbing the iconic clock tower for over 16 hours. He faces charges of causing a public nuisance and trespassing.
A 29-year-old man, Daniel Day, has entered a not guilty plea in Southwark Crown Court regarding charges related to climbing the Elizabeth Tower, commonly known as Big Ben. The incident occurred on March 8, during which Day allegedly scaled the iconic clock tower barefoot around 7.20 am, remaining perched there for over 16 hours. He was eventually brought down by authorities using a cherry picker just after midnight.
Day faces charges of intentionally or recklessly causing a public nuisance and trespassing on a protected site. During the court appearance, Judge Tony Baumgartner granted Day conditional bail while he awaits trial. The proceedings were marked by a display of support from Day's admirers, with members of the public gallery applauding and cheering as the judge concluded the hearing.
Outside the courthouse, a gathering of pro-Palestine protesters demonstrated their support for Day. They waved Palestinian flags and engaged in rhythmic drumming, voicing their opposition to the charges he faces.
Daniel Day's next court date has been set for June 8, 2026, where further proceedings will take place regarding the allegations made against him. The situation surrounding Day’s actions has drawn significant attention, highlighting issues related to public expression and the implications of his protest.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative mentions a recent incident and includes a specific court date in 2026, indicating that the content is recent and not recycled.
Quotes check
Score:
0
Notes:
There are no direct quotes in the provided text to verify.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from MyLondon, a local news outlet, which generally provides reliable local news coverage though it may not be as prominent as larger international publications.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about the incident and legal proceedings are plausible and align with common types of public demonstrations and protests. However, specific details about ongoing cases can sometimes lack full context.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative appears fresh and involves plausible events related to a recent incident. The source is reasonably reliable for local news, though the lack of direct quotes limits verification of spoken content.
