Argjent Haziri, 22, from Barnet, has been disqualified from driving for more than eight years following a high-speed chase and collision with a police vehicle in Guildford. Haziri admitted to multiple offences including driving dangerously and failure to provide a sample for analysis, highlighting the serious risks faced by officers on duty.
In a recent court case at Guildford Crown Court on April 15, a 22-year-old man was disqualified from driving for over eight years following a high-speed chase and collision involving a police vehicle. Argjent Haziri, from Cromer Road, Barnet, admitted to multiple offences including driving dangerously, driving without insurance, driving while disqualified, and failure to provide a specimen for analysis.
The incident occurred in October 2024 when officers from the Roads Policing Unit (RPU) were patrolling the Epsom Downs area. During their patrol, the officers identified a "vehicle of interest" and attempted to stop the driver. This led to a pursuit heading towards Epsom town centre. Although the police initially lost sight of the car, it was later spotted in Normandy, Guildford.
Upon arrival, Haziri's vehicle turned sharply towards oncoming officers in what seemed to be an attempt to evade capture. The driver collided at speed with the police car in the effort to pass the officers. PC Pat Nixon of the RPU commented on the incident, saying, "Our officers put themselves at risk whilst attempting to bring a dangerous individual to justice after he failed to stop for police. Their actions protected the public, and it is a stark reminder to any criminal using Surrey's roads that we do everything possible to bring you to justice."
The case highlights the risks faced by police officers in the course of their duties and the serious consequences for drivers who engage in dangerous behaviour on the roads. Haziri's guilty plea to all charges resulted in a substantial driving disqualification, reflecting the gravity of the offences committed during the pursuit.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative refers to an event concluded very recently, with the court case dated April 15, 2025, and the incident occurring in October 2024. There is no indication that the information is recycled or outdated. The timeline is consistent and current.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The direct quote from PC Pat Nixon appears original and specific to this case. No earlier references were found online, suggesting it is a first use of this statement, enhancing its credibility.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative comes from a local news entity known for regional reporting. While not a major international outlet, it has a track record of covering local incidents reliably. However, its overall prominence and editorial standards are less established than major international news organisations.
Plausibility check
Score:
9
Notes:
The account of a police chase leading to a collision and subsequent court sentencing is plausible and consistent with typical law enforcement and judicial processes. The details align well with known procedures and behaviours, with no extraordinary claims requiring additional verification.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative presents a timely and credible account of a recent police chase and court case with an original witness quote. The regional news outlet is generally reliable for such reporting, and the story details align with expected real-world events. No evidence of recycled information or fabrication was found.
