Paul Doyle, 53, appeared at Liverpool Crown Court charged with multiple serious offences after deliberately driving into a crowd during Liverpool FC’s victory parade, injuring 79 people including four children. The trial is scheduled for November amid ongoing police investigations and concerns over event safety.
A former Royal Marine, Paul Doyle, appeared visibly distressed in Liverpool Crown Court as he was charged with a range of serious offences following a disturbing incident during Liverpool FC's victory parade. The 53-year-old is facing multiple allegations, including two counts of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and two counts of wounding with intent, among others. The charges stem from a chaotic scene on Water Street, where Doyle is accused of deliberately driving his vehicle into a throng of fans, resulting in injuries to 79 individuals, including four children aged just 11 and 17.
At the magistrates' court, the atmosphere was charged, with dozens of people gathered outside, keen to witness the proceedings. Doyle, who is a resident of Croxteth, arrived in court looking emotional and spoke only to confirm his personal details, leaving his plea undecided as his case was referred to Liverpool Crown Court, which is situated within the same building. The recorder, Judge Andrew Menary, scheduled a provisional trial date for 24 November and noted that the case could potentially last three to four weeks. A plea hearing has been arranged for 14 August, offering the defendant an opportunity to address the charges formally.
Prosecutor Philip Astbury outlined the complexity of the case, stating, "This is very much an ongoing investigation. There are many witnesses to be interviewed and a great deal of CCTV to be analysed." The severity of the situation is compounded by the fact that six of the charges pertain specifically to the most severely injured victims. Despite the troubling nature of the allegations, Doyle, dressed in a black suit with a white shirt and grey tie, remained stoic as he was remanded in custody, indicating a level of seriousness taken by the court regarding the circumstances of the case.
Recent reports indicated that seven individuals from the total of 79 injured during the parade remained in hospital, raising concerns for their recovery. The Liverpool parade, previously a celebratory occasion, transformed into a site of emergency as the crowd's joy was abruptly interrupted. In light of the incident, police presence at the court and during the parade serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for public safety measures at large events, ensuring that such tragic occurrences are minimised in the future.
As the case unfolds, many will be watching closely, concerned not only for the victims and their families but also for the broader implications regarding community safety during high-profile public events. The incident has sparked discussions on the responsibilities of both drivers and event organisers to ensure the safety of all attendees during communal celebrations.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is based on a press release from the Independent, dated 30 May 2025, reporting on Paul Doyle's court appearance and charges related to the Liverpool parade incident. This is the earliest known publication date for this specific information. The report includes updated data on the charges and court proceedings, indicating a high freshness score. No earlier versions with differing figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative does not appear to be recycled across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The inclusion of updated data justifies a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk-man-appears-court-over-liverpool-car-collision-that-hurt-dozens-2025-05-30/?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The direct quote from Prosecutor Philip Astbury, "This is very much an ongoing investigation. There are many witnesses to be interviewed and a great deal of CCTV to be analysed," appears in the Independent's report dated 30 May 2025. No earlier instances of this exact quote were found, suggesting it is original or exclusive content. The wording matches the source, with no variations noted.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Independent, a reputable UK news organisation. The report is corroborated by other reputable outlets, including Reuters and the Associated Press, which also covered the incident and charges against Paul Doyle. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk-man-appears-court-over-liverpool-car-collision-that-hurt-dozens-2025-05-30/?utm_source=openai), [apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/3dee4f91b893d992ae4ac568819756f1?utm_source=openai)) This cross-referencing with multiple reputable sources enhances the reliability of the information.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative's claims are consistent with reports from other reputable outlets, including Reuters and the Associated Press, which also covered the incident and charges against Paul Doyle. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk-man-appears-court-over-liverpool-car-collision-that-hurt-dozens-2025-05-30/?utm_source=openai), [apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/3dee4f91b893d992ae4ac568819756f1?utm_source=openai)) The details provided, such as the charges against Doyle and the court proceedings, align with information from these sources. The language and tone are appropriate for a news report, and there are no inconsistencies or signs of disinformation.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and corroborated by multiple reputable sources, including the Independent, Reuters, and the Associated Press. The quotes are unique, and the information is consistent with other reports on the incident. There are no signs of disinformation or credibility issues.
