After being dismissed from Radio Wales following a four-month investigation into his conduct, Wynne Evans branded the BBC "rotten to the core" and is considering legal action to restore his reputation amid further controversy.
In the wake of his recent dismissal from the BBC, Wynne Evans has openly expressed disdain for the broadcaster, labelling it as “rotten to the core” and a “corrupt organisation.” This criticism comes after an investigation into his conduct while working with the corporation led to the termination of his contract at Radio Wales, following a series of controversial incidents.
The 53-year-old opera singer, who is recognisable as the face of Go Compare, was informed of his dismissal after a four-month inquiry scrutinised his behaviour. Reports indicate that a pivotal moment in the investigation was sparked by a video where Evans used a crude sexual term during a Strictly Come Dancing press event earlier this year. His choice of words included the vile slur “spit roast,” which he directed in a joking manner towards his co-star, Janette Manrara. A source within the BBC noted that Evans might have avoided this predicament had he refrained from his confrontational rhetoric and the subsequent online tirades aimed at the network and its employees.
Additionally, it emerged that his earlier actions had prompted significant backlash. A surprising video surfaced revealing Evans sending a sex toy to fellow participant Jamie Borthwick, which was deemed highly inappropriate. Such behaviour has significantly tarnished his reputation, prompting him to claim he was “misrepresented” and encouraging his followers to support him by contacting the BBC’s director general, Tim Davie.
In a notable turn of events, Evans is reportedly pondering legal action against the BBC, believing his reputation has been irreparably damaged. He has hired crisis PR expert Mark Borkowski in an attempt to navigate this tumultuous period, although sources suggest that the consultancy lasted merely three days. The legal strategy appears to include a 30-page dossier aimed at clearing his name, containing various evidential materials to challenge the corporation's decisions.
As the scandal unfolded, more incidents came to light that have caused friction between his broadcasting commitments and personal conduct. Beyond his comments about Manrara, Evans faced scrutiny for hosting a Conservative fundraiser, which resulted in calls from public figures, such as Labour MP Chris Bryant, for his resignation or removal, reinforcing the scrutiny over his activities outside of his broadcasting role. Despite these challenges, Evans has expressed a desire to return to his position at Radio Wales, revealing an unwillingness to concede without a fight.
In his public statements, Evans has appeared resolute and defiant, asserting that he cannot foresee a return to the BBC but has plans to continue his career elsewhere. As he seeks to salvage his professional reputation, the ongoing situation raises questions about the responsibilities of public figures and the impact of social media on their personal and professional lives. Whether Evans can secure his future in the entertainment industry remains uncertain as he navigates a complex landscape of public perception and corporate governance.
With his career hanging in the balance, Wynne Evans’s story is an emblematic case of how celebrity culture intersects with accountability, revealing the precariousness of fame in an era defined by instant communication and public scrutiny.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative presents recent events, including Wynne Evans' dismissal from the BBC and his subsequent criticisms. The earliest known publication date of similar content is 26 January 2025, when Evans apologised for an 'inappropriate and unacceptable' remark during the Strictly Come Dancing live tour launch. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/jan/26/wynne-evans-apologises-unacceptable-sexual-remark-strictly-tour-launch?utm_source=openai)) The report appears to be based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, the inclusion of updated data alongside older material suggests that while the update may justify a higher freshness score, it should still be flagged. Additionally, the narrative includes specific details not found in earlier reports, such as Evans' plans to take legal action against the BBC and his hiring of crisis PR expert Mark Borkowski, indicating a higher freshness score. The report does not appear to be republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. No similar content was found more than 7 days earlier.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes attributed to Wynne Evans, such as his apology for the 'inappropriate and unacceptable' remark and his plans to take legal action against the BBC. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from 26 January 2025, when Evans apologised for the remark during the Strictly Come Dancing live tour launch. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/jan/26/wynne-evans-apologises-unacceptable-sexual-remark-strictly-tour-launch?utm_source=openai)) No identical quotes appear in earlier material, suggesting the content is potentially original or exclusive. No variations in quote wording were noted.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Daily Mail, a publication known for sensationalist reporting. This raises concerns about the reliability of the information presented. The report includes specific details about Evans' alleged actions and plans, which are not corroborated by other reputable sources. The lack of coverage from more established outlets further diminishes the credibility of the report. Additionally, the report mentions Evans' hiring of crisis PR expert Mark Borkowski, but this information is not supported by other reputable sources. The absence of corroboration from more reliable sources suggests potential issues with the report's reliability.
Plausability check
Score:
5
Notes:
The narrative makes several claims, including Evans' dismissal from the BBC, his criticism of the broadcaster, and his plans to take legal action. While some of these claims are supported by earlier reports, such as Evans' apology for the 'inappropriate and unacceptable' remark during the Strictly Come Dancing live tour launch, other claims lack corroboration from reputable sources. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/jan/26/wynne-evans-apologises-unacceptable-sexual-remark-strictly-tour-launch?utm_source=openai)) The report also includes specific details about Evans' alleged actions and plans, which are not supported by other reputable sources. The lack of coverage from more established outlets further diminishes the plausibility of the claims. The tone of the report is unusually dramatic, which is inconsistent with typical corporate or official language, raising further questions about its plausibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent events concerning Wynne Evans' dismissal from the BBC and his subsequent criticisms. While some claims are supported by earlier reports, many lack corroboration from reputable sources, and the report originates from a publication known for sensationalist reporting. The lack of coverage from more established outlets and the inclusion of unverified details raise significant concerns about the report's reliability and plausibility. Therefore, the overall assessment is a 'FAIL' with medium confidence.