Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been charged with crimes against humanity related to deadly crackdowns during last year’s protests. As Bangladesh's interim government seeks her extradition from India, allegations of mass killings, corruption, and political violence deepen the ongoing crisis.
The recent developments surrounding Sheikh Hasina, the ousted Prime Minister of Bangladesh, have taken a dramatic turn as she faces serious allegations of crimes against humanity. Following her flight to India amidst a violent uprising that led to her removal from power in August 2024, arrest warrants have been issued not only for her but for other high-ranking officials, including former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan and former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, who has already been arrested.
The circumstances surrounding these charges are dire. The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) in Bangladesh alleges that Hasina orchestrated brutal crackdowns on protesters, resulting in an estimated 1,400 deaths during the anti-government protests last summer. These actions reportedly included targeted violence against women and children, as well as the denial of medical treatment to the injured. Eyewitness accounts detail horrific incidents, such as the burning of a wounded protester alive, highlighting the severity of the accusations levelled against her.
Under investigation for a range of human rights violations, Hasina is also linked to broader allegations of corruption related to a £4 billion embezzlement probe involving her family, including her niece, Labour MP Tulip Siddiq. The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) has launched an inquiry into claims that both Hasina and her family illegally allocated state resources and profited from dubious deals. Siddiq has denied these allegations, calling them "targeted and baseless."
International reaction has added layers to the unfolding scenario. Bangladesh's interim government, now led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has officially requested Hasina’s extradition from India. This request comes amidst rising tensions between India and Bangladesh, particularly as India has received communication regarding the extradition but has yet to comment publicly. The relationship between the two nations complicates matters further, especially given historical ties and recent accusations of human rights violations within Bangladesh.
Public sentiment in Bangladesh appears to be strongly against Hasina, with thousands participating in protests demanding justice for the victims of last summer's violence. Advocacy groups continue to push for a transparent investigation into her actions and those of her affiliates. There are calls for not only her prosecution but also for the disbanding of the Awami League party, which has been accused of fomenting violence to maintain power.
As the situation evolves, the interim administration has pledged to uphold justice, inviting international oversight in what they describe as an urgent need for accountability. The complexities of this case resonate far beyond Bangladeshi borders, intertwining issues of international extradition, human rights obligations, and geopolitical relationships, particularly between India and Bangladesh.
In the coming weeks, the ICT is set to commence proceedings against Hasina and several others accused of orchestrating the violence, with a court date scheduled for June 16, 2025. Should she fail to appear, it may pave the way for a trial in absentia, raising pressing questions about justice, governance, and human rights in Bangladesh.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents recent developments, including the commencement of Sheikh Hasina's trial on June 1, 2025, and the scheduled court date of June 16, 2025. These events are current and have not been reported elsewhere, indicating high freshness. However, the article references earlier events, such as the July-August 2024 uprising and the October 2024 arrest warrants, which are well-documented in previous reports. The inclusion of these earlier events may slightly reduce the freshness score. Additionally, the article includes a reference map with links to other sources, which may indicate a reliance on existing reports. Nonetheless, the focus on recent developments suggests a high freshness score. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/e5ccb5ce4c340e86b0ecac7d9d98893f?utm_source=openai), [ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/1277b3bb-a299-47e1-8973-e68591e7d982?utm_source=openai), [reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/bangladesh-crimes-tribunal-issues-arrest-warrant-exiled-former-prime-minister-2024-10-17/?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from various sources, such as the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and Human Rights Watch. These quotes are consistent with statements made in previous reports, indicating that they are not original to this narrative. The use of these quotes suggests that the article is drawing from existing sources rather than presenting exclusive information. However, the inclusion of recent developments and the specific court dates provide some level of originality. Overall, the quotes are not original, but the article does incorporate recent information. ([thediplomat.com](https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/un-report-exposes-sheikh-hasinas-commanding-role-in-possible-crimes-against-humanity-in-bangladesh/?utm_source=openai), [hrw.org](https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/22/bangladesh-arrest-warrant-sheikh-hasina?utm_source=openai))
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Mail, a UK-based tabloid newspaper known for sensationalist reporting. This raises concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information presented. The article includes references to other reputable sources, such as the Financial Times and Reuters, which may lend some credibility to the information. However, the reliance on a tabloid source and the inclusion of sensationalist language suggest a need for caution in accepting the information at face value. ([ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/1277b3bb-a299-47e1-8973-e68591e7d982?utm_source=openai), [reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/bangladesh-crimes-tribunal-issues-arrest-warrant-exiled-former-prime-minister-2024-10-17/?utm_source=openai))
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents a coherent account of recent events in Bangladesh, including the trial of Sheikh Hasina and the allegations against her. The information aligns with reports from other reputable sources, such as the Associated Press and Reuters, indicating that the events described are plausible. However, the inclusion of sensationalist language and the reliance on a tabloid source may raise questions about the tone and framing of the narrative. Overall, the events described are plausible, but the presentation may be influenced by the source's editorial style. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/e5ccb5ce4c340e86b0ecac7d9d98893f?utm_source=openai), [ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/1277b3bb-a299-47e1-8973-e68591e7d982?utm_source=openai))
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent developments regarding Sheikh Hasina's trial and the allegations against her, incorporating information from reputable sources. However, the reliance on a tabloid source known for sensationalist reporting raises concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information. The inclusion of earlier events and the use of direct quotes from existing reports suggest that the content may not be entirely original. Given these factors, the overall assessment is a 'FAIL' with medium confidence.