The identities of four victims injured during the Liverpool Premier League victory parade crash have been revealed following a court decision to lift reporting restrictions, as the driver faces serious charges including grievous bodily harm and dangerous driving.
Four victims of the tragic crash during Liverpool's Premier League victory parade have been named after a court lifted reporting restrictions. The incident, which took place on 26 May, has left 109 individuals injured after a car drove into crowds of jubilant fans celebrating in the city centre following Liverpool's football victory.
The four individuals identified are Simon Nash, 52; Susan Passey, 77; Christine Seeckts, 66; and Ethan Gillard, 18. All four were injured during the chaotic scene at around 6pm on Water Street. Paul Doyle, the 53-year-old driver, now faces seven serious charges, including causing grievous bodily harm with intent towards Passey and Seeckts, as well as unlawful wounding of Nash and attempted grievous bodily harm of Gillard. The charges are a culmination of the initial shock and repercussions of the event that marred a day of celebration.
Doyle's case has been the subject of extensive legal scrutiny. He was initially presented before magistrates on Friday, where an order prohibiting the publication of the victims' identities took effect. However, this was lifted by the Recorder of Liverpool, Judge Andrew Menary KC, allowing their names to be disclosed.
In addition to the charges concerning the aforementioned victims, Doyle is also facing further accusations of dangerous driving. He allegedly operated his Ford Galaxy Titanium in a recklessly dangerous manner on the streets leading from his home address to the parade venue, as indicated by court documents. Following the court proceedings, Doyle has been remanded in custody, with a plea hearing scheduled for 14 August and a trial set for 24 November.
The severity of injuries sustained during the incident is notable. As of Monday, four individuals remained hospitalised due to the crash. Following the event, Merseyside Police reported a rising number of injuries, reflecting the serious impact of the collision on the lively crowd. The police have committed to a thorough investigation, ensuring that all details come to light and that justice is served for those affected by this devastating event.
As details continue to emerge, the community grapples with the implications of the tragedy, marked by the vulnerability of its celebratory spirit. The incident serves as a grim reminder of the precarious nature of public gatherings and the responsibilities of those behind the wheel.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is recent, published on 3 June 2025, detailing the identification of four victims in the Liverpool parade crash. The earliest known publication date of similar content is 29 May 2025, when the suspect was named. The report cites court proceedings and official statements, indicating a high freshness score. No evidence of recycled content or clickbait republishing was found. The narrative is based on a court ruling lifting reporting restrictions, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The inclusion of updated data without recycling older material further supports the high freshness score.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The report includes direct quotes from court proceedings and official statements. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from the court session on 3 June 2025, as reported by The Independent. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality. No variations in quote wording were found, confirming consistency.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Independent, a reputable UK news outlet. The report is based on official court proceedings and statements from Merseyside Police, enhancing its reliability. No unverifiable entities or fabricated information were identified.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative aligns with other reputable reports on the incident, including those from Reuters and the Associated Press. The details about the victims' identities and the charges against the suspect are consistent across multiple sources. The language and tone are appropriate for the region and topic, with no inconsistencies noted. The structure is focused and relevant, without excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is formal and consistent with typical news reporting, with no signs of sensationalism.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is recent, original, and sourced from a reputable outlet, with consistent and plausible claims supported by official statements and court proceedings. No significant credibility risks were identified, leading to a high confidence in the assessment.
