Fundraising efforts are underway as campaigners intensify their fight against Hillingdon Council’s decision to close the Rural Activities Garden Centre (RAGC) in West London. The Friends of the Rural Activities Garden Centre (FRAGC), a community group committed to supporting the centre, have launched a crowdfunding campaign to finance a pre-action letter for a judicial review challenging the council’s closure decision made in July.

The RAGC has been a cherished resource for over 40 years, providing therapeutic horticultural activities and support for adults with learning disabilities and autism. Maintained primarily by volunteers with these disabilities, the centre has been credited with fostering wellbeing, confidence, and independence among vulnerable residents. Families and community members have expressed deep concern that the closure would remove a unique and vital environment not easily replaced elsewhere.

FRAGC contend that Hillingdon Council's actions amount to "corporate vandalism" and critique the authority for failing to process their nominations to designate RAGC as an Asset of Community Value (ACV). This status would require the council to offer the community group the right to bid if the land were sold, a process designed to safeguard community assets. The group also highlights that the council neglected to respond positively to a petition bearing over 6,000 signatures opposing the closure—a petition among the largest in the borough's history.

John Scrivens, parent of an RAGC volunteer, spoke to the Local Democracy Reporting Service emphasizing the campaign’s widespread support, which extends well beyond the south of the borough. He expressed bewilderment at the council’s reluctance to process the ACV nominations and underscored the group’s resolve to pursue a fair outcome for the learning-disabled volunteers. Andrea Scrivens, also pivotal in the campaign, voiced rumours that the council might sell the land, which the council has denied. She clarified that even with ACV status, while sale could not be prevented outright, the community would have the first opportunity to purchase.

The council acknowledged delays in processing the ACV nomination, describing the process as complex and assuring that a decision would be made soon. They further stated that while a pre-action letter for judicial review had not yet been received, any such correspondence would be thoroughly considered before determining next steps. Concerning the closure, the council claimed that volunteers would be offered a "more meaningful range of activities" at alternative locations.

Campaigners marked a significant milestone when the crowdfunding drive rapidly raised over £2,000, reaching its initial fundraising target faster than anticipated. Additional legal fundraising efforts are ongoing through platforms such as CrowdJustice, with aims to cover the costs of the judicial review and broader advocacy work.

Hillingdon Council’s decision to cease retail operations at RAGC was finalised at a cabinet meeting on 26 June 2025, despite a strong demonstration by over 100 residents outside the Civic Centre. Councillor Jonathan Bianco reaffirmed the council’s commitment to supporting statutory care users, promising continued engagement with volunteers about future support services.

Healthwatch Hillingdon and other local advocacy groups have voiced unease regarding the closure, noting the centre’s unique therapeutic offerings that other social care provisions may not replicate adequately. The decision forms part of wider changes proposed by the council to its social care provision, sparking ongoing debate over the best ways to support vulnerable adults in the borough.

As the campaign moves forward, invitations have been extended for residents to attend council meetings and express their views on the proposed closure. With legal action pending and community support mobilising, the fate of the Rural Activities Garden Centre remains a contested issue reflective of broader tensions in local government care reforms and community asset protection.

📌 Reference Map:

  • Paragraph 1 – [1] (MyLondon), [2] (FRAGC website)
  • Paragraph 2 – [1] (MyLondon), [4] (Healthwatch Hillingdon)
  • Paragraph 3 – [1] (MyLondon), [3] (Ruislip Residents’ Association)
  • Paragraph 4 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 5 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 6 – [1] (MyLondon)
  • Paragraph 7 – [5] (CrowdJustice)
  • Paragraph 8 – [6] (My Local News)
  • Paragraph 9 – [4] (Healthwatch Hillingdon), [6] (My Local News)
  • Paragraph 10 – [7] (FRAGC website), [3] (Ruislip Residents’ Association)

Source: Noah Wire Services