London Mayor Sadiq Khan faces mounting criticism over his handling of grooming gang issues, as Conservative politician Susan Hall challenges his transparency amid a major police inquiry into child sexual exploitation in the capital.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan has come under sharp criticism for his perceived lack of transparency and evasiveness regarding the serious issue of grooming gangs operating in the capital. Susan Hall, leader of the Conservative group at the London Assembly and a former mayoral candidate, has been particularly vocal in challenging Khan on this matter. Hall argues that despite Khan overseeing a massive £21 billion budget, the largest police force, fire brigade, and Transport for London (TfL), media scrutiny of his handling of child exploitation cases has been conspicuously insufficient.
In January 2025, during a London Assembly meeting, Hall pressed Khan repeatedly—nine times, according to her—on whether grooming gangs existed in London and whether funding would be guaranteed for police investigations into the issue. However, Khan reportedly demanded clarification on what she meant by "grooming gangs" instead of providing a direct answer. This exchange was met with widespread dismay and accusations that Khan was deliberately avoiding accountability. Hall described the Mayor’s responses as “shocking” and expressed concern that his reluctance to address the problem openly might deter victims from coming forward and impede justice for survivors.
The Metropolitan Police have since launched a large-scale inquiry into grooming gangs, revealing some 9,000 cases of child sexual exploitation in London. This development underscores the gravity and pervasiveness of the issue, which had long been questioned by politicians and campaigners alike. The inquiry came after mounting public and political pressure, including criticism targeted at Mayor Khan for what some perceive as his dismissive attitude towards reports of grooming gangs operating across the city.
An investigation by The Daily Express and MyLondon further highlighted distressing accounts of young girls being sexually exploited in hotels by organised groups of men. Despite this evidence, Khan was accused of turning a blind eye to the problem, with critics lamenting a lack of proactive measures or public acknowledgment from the Mayor’s office. Some media outlets, such as the BBC, have been pointedly criticised for failing to hold Khan to account on this issue, instead reportedly focusing on positive publicity surrounding his community initiatives.
Susan Hall and other Conservative figures have called for greater transparency and accountability from the Mayor, asserting that the scale of the problem demands more rigorous public and media scrutiny. Hall’s challenges to Khan, which have gained significant traction on social media, reflect a broader frustration with political leadership perceived to be out of touch with some of London’s most serious public safety concerns.
The Mayor’s office was approached for comment following these criticisms but did not provide a response. This silence has furthered perceptions of evasion, with stakeholders insisting that tackling grooming gangs and protecting vulnerable children should be a top priority for London’s leadership.
📌 Reference Map:
- Paragraph 1 – [1] (Express), [3] (GB News Opinion)
- Paragraph 2 – [2] (GB News Politics), [5] (GB News Opinion), [6] (Evening Standard)
- Paragraph 3 – [7] (BNP), [3] (GB News Opinion)
- Paragraph 4 – [4] (GB News Politics), [1] (Express)
- Paragraph 5 – [1] (Express), [3] (GB News Opinion)
- Paragraph 6 – [2] (GB News Politics), [6] (Evening Standard)
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents recent events, including Susan Hall's questioning of Sadiq Khan in January 2025 and subsequent developments up to October 2025. The earliest known publication date of similar content is January 16, 2025, when GB News reported on the exchange between Hall and Khan. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/politics/sadiq-khan-london-grooming-gangs-city-hall-susan-hall?utm_source=openai)) The report includes updated data, such as the Metropolitan Police reassessing 9,000 grooming gang cases, which justifies a higher freshness score. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/news/grooming-gangs-met-police-sadiq-khan-ignored-problem?utm_source=openai)) However, the narrative has been republished across multiple outlets, including GB News and The Standard, indicating potential recycling of content. ([standard.co.uk](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/grooming-gangs-london-mayor-sadiq-khan-stonewalling-tory-questions-b1205508.html?utm_source=openai)) Additionally, the narrative is based on a press release from GB News, which typically warrants a high freshness score. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/politics/grooming-gangs-sadiq-khan-susan-hall-fiery-tirade-dismissal-scandal?utm_source=openai)) No significant discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/news/grooming-gangs-met-police-sadiq-khan-ignored-problem?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The direct quotes from Susan Hall and Sadiq Khan have been used in earlier material, with identical wording found in GB News reports from January 2025. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/politics/sadiq-khan-london-grooming-gangs-city-hall-susan-hall?utm_source=openai)) No significant variations in quote wording were noted. The absence of online matches for some quotes suggests potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from GB News, a reputable organisation. However, the report includes content from The Standard, which is a single-outlet narrative, raising some uncertainty. The mention of the BNP as a source is concerning, as it is an obscure and unverifiable organisation, potentially indicating a fabricated source. ([standard.co.uk](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/grooming-gangs-london-mayor-sadiq-khan-stonewalling-tory-questions-b1205508.html?utm_source=openai))
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative's claims are plausible and align with recent events, including the Metropolitan Police reassessing 9,000 grooming gang cases. ([gbnews.com](https://www.gbnews.com/news/grooming-gangs-met-police-sadiq-khan-ignored-problem?utm_source=openai)) The lack of coverage from other reputable outlets on some aspects raises questions about the narrative's originality. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic, and the structure is focused on the main claim without excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is dramatic but not unusually so for this type of reporting.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent events and includes updated data, justifying a higher freshness score. However, the recycling of content across multiple outlets and the inclusion of a potentially fabricated source from the BNP raise concerns about the narrative's originality and source reliability. The plausibility of the claims is supported by recent events, but the lack of coverage from other reputable outlets on some aspects suggests further scrutiny is needed.