A recent High Court ruling has ordered PPE Medpro, a company linked to Conservative peer Baroness Michelle Mone and her husband Doug Barrowman, to repay £122 million to the UK government after it failed to supply sterile surgical gowns as per the contract. The gowns, manufactured in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, were found not to meet sterility certification standards, rendering them unsuitable for use by the National Health Service (NHS). According to the court’s judgment, PPE Medpro breached the contract by failing to validate the gowns as sterile, justifying the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) rejection of the goods and call for reimbursement. However, the claim for an additional £8.6 million in storage costs was dismissed.

The scandal underscores ongoing concerns about transparency and accountability in government procurement amid the pandemic. PPE Medpro received government contracts worth £200 million, routed through a “VIP lane” offering preferential access to firms with political ties. Baroness Mone, a businesswoman and politician, used her contacts to recommend PPE Medpro for these lucrative deals. Initially, both she and Mr Barrowman denied involvement or financial benefit from the company, but after several years of denial, they admitted to being involved in the consortium behind PPE Medpro and acknowledged financial gains. Mr Barrowman has admitted receiving around £60 million from the firm, part of which Baroness Mone stated was paid into a trust benefiting her and her children.

Despite the large sum involved, the company itself holds assets worth only £666,000, making full repayment unlikely. PPE Medpro entered administration shortly before the ruling, with administrators tasked with maximising creditor recoveries. A spokesperson for the company highlighted that £83 million of the government payments went to partner companies within the consortium, including Loudwater Trade and Finance and Eric Beare Associates. The spokesperson argued there is a “very strong case” for administrators to pursue these other entities for the funds, as the company itself did not carry out technical work such as liaising with the Chinese manufacturers or conducting quality control.

The National Crime Agency is investigating the case, although it has not confirmed if other consortium members are under scrutiny. Meanwhile, calls have grown for Baroness Mone to repay the money personally and even for her to be stripped of her peerage, given her prominent role in securing the contracts through political influence. Yet, Baroness Mone maintains that, while she acknowledges her involvement, she disputes any wrongdoing.

The government, under the leadership of Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Treasury Chief Rachel Reeves, has committed to recovering “everything we can” from PPE Medpro and is cooperating closely with the administrators to recoup losses. The recovered funds are earmarked to support frontline public services, reflecting a determined effort by the Labour administration to address procurement failures from the pandemic period.

This case is emblematic of a wider controversy around COVID-19 contracts in the UK, which has faced criticism over lack of competitive tendering and perceived cronyism. Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden has defended the government’s actions at the time, insisting no special treatment was given to connected firms. Nonetheless, the PPE Medpro affair continues to provoke debate about political influence, transparency, and accountability during emergency public spending.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services