The European Parliament has taken a significant step towards harmonising digital safety rules for minors across the European Union by approving a non-binding resolution that calls for a default minimum age of 16 for access to social media platforms, video-sharing services, and AI chatbots. This move aims to standardise what is currently a fragmented landscape where each EU member state sets its own age restrictions under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The resolution further stipulates that children aged 13 to 16 should be able to access these platforms only with parental consent, while those under 13 should be entirely barred from online engagement with such services.

Although the resolution carries no legal force, it clearly signals the European Parliament's firm stance on protecting minors in the digital space and promoting age-appropriate online interaction. It also proposes additional safeguards, such as banning addictive design features that encourage excessive screen time, prohibiting manipulative advertising tactics, and curbing gambling-like elements that may exploit young users. Moreover, the resolution calls for the blocking of websites that fail to comply with EU regulations and raises concerns about AI tools capable of generating fake or inappropriate content, highlighting the evolving risks posed by emerging technologies.

This initiative emerges amid growing concerns about the mental health impact of social media on children, reflecting a wider global trend with similar proposals under consideration in countries like Australia, Denmark, and Malaysia. Danish lawmaker Christel Schaldemose, who sponsored the resolution, publicly criticised large technology firms and influential figures in the tech industry for what she describes as exploitation of children’s attention with little regulatory oversight. The resolution corresponds with increased scrutiny of platforms such as Elon Musk’s X and TikTok, which have previously faced formal investigations for breaches of the DSA.

Any binding legislation based on the resolution would require formal proposals from the European Commission, followed by lengthy negotiations between member states and the European Parliament, typically a process that can take several years. This longer-term perspective resembles other EU measures on child protection online, including ongoing debates about how aggressively to regulate Big Tech companies regarding the detection and removal of harmful content like child sexual abuse material. Recent EU decisions have leaned towards balancing child protection with privacy concerns advocated by tech firms and privacy groups.

Meanwhile, several member states complement the EU-wide approach with their own stricter national regulations. For example, Spain has announced measures including enhanced parental controls on smartphones, raising the age of data protection consent from 14 to 16, and criminalising AI-generated pornographic images involving minors. These national policies reflect increasing public concern about the risks of social media and reinforce the need for a consistent EU framework to safeguard children effectively.

The resolution also comes at a time of intense scrutiny of AI practices within the EU. Meta Platforms recently began using public adult social media interactions to train its AI models in Europe, carefully excluding data from private messages and users under 18 to respect stringent privacy laws. Nonetheless, investigations into how AI technology companies manage user data for training purposes continue, keeping the regulatory landscape dynamic and complex.

In summary, while the European Parliament’s resolution does not yet impose legally binding rules, it marks a pivotal political stance aimed at unifying and strengthening protections for children across the EU digital environment. It underscores the challenges of balancing innovation, privacy, and child safety in an era increasingly shaped by social media and AI-driven platforms.

📌 Reference Map:

  • [1] (Cyprus Mail) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3
  • [2] (Reuters) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2
  • [3] (Reuters) - Paragraph 1
  • [4] (Reuters) - Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3
  • [5] (Reuters) - Paragraph 4
  • [7] (Reuters) - Paragraph 5
  • [6] (Reuters) - Paragraph 6

Source: Noah Wire Services