A monumental AI datacentre proposed for Lincolnshire has stirred significant environmental concern, with projections indicating it could emit five times the carbon dioxide of Birmingham Airport upon reaching full operation. The planning application for this ambitious £10 billion facility was submitted recently, with a public consultation currently open for feedback over the next three weeks.

According to documents highlighted by The Guardian, the datacentre is estimated to consume around 3.7 billion kWh of energy, resulting in annual carbon dioxide emissions of 857,254 tonnes, based on the current energy mix of the National Grid. The facility is set to be constructed nine miles east of Scunthorpe and would comprise 15 computer warehouses, a staggering investment reflecting the substantial resources required to power such an endeavour.

Research from the Yale School of the Environment underscores the extensive energy demands of AI compared to traditional computing. Their findings suggest that the environmental footprints of AI operations extend beyond direct carbon emissions, linking the technology to vast water consumption and increased pressure on existing resources. This includes significant usage of freshwater necessary for cooling systems in data centres, which can conflict with local water needs. A notable example is in Oregon, where local authorities filed lawsuits against Google to limit its water usage due to concerns from farmers and Indigenous communities about its impact on agriculture and natural ecosystems.

The environmental implications do not end there. Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, has emphasised that while AI holds transformative potential, the responsibility lies with societies and governments to utilise it wisely. The debate surrounding the Lincolnshire datacentre exemplifies this tension, especially as other major tech enterprises face increasing scrutiny for their carbon footprints. Over the past five years, Google’s greenhouse gas emissions have surged by 48%, a trend attributed to the rising energy demands of AI-driven services. The company, while aiming for net-zero emissions by 2030, acknowledges the complexities involved in reconciling growth with sustainability.

In contrast to the Lincolnshire project, other data centre initiatives have emerged that seek to mitigate environmental impact. A £3 billion data centre campus is in the works within the same region, designed to capture waste heat for district heating systems supporting local agriculture. This facility aims not only to reduce emissions but also to create jobs and support local economic growth, with estimates suggesting it could generate up to 3,500 construction jobs.

However, the surge in datacentre developments prompts broader questions about the sustainability of AI and its alignment with climate goals. Current UK government ambitions, promoted by Labour leader Keir Starmer, include a goal to reduce emissions by 81% while simultaneously committing to an unprecedented expansion of AI computing power. This dual commitment raises doubts about the government’s prioritisation of environmental integrity against the backdrop of capitalist ambitions.

Environmental advocacy groups, such as Friends of the Earth, are closely monitoring this multifaceted issue, reminding the government of its legal obligations to meet climate targets. Mike Childs, head of science, policy, and research at the organisation, has underscored that the government cannot ignore its duty to the planet amidst vigorous political manoeuvring. Friends of the Earth has previously held the government accountable, successfully challenging the former Conservative administration regarding energy targets in court.

In this context, the expanding footprint of AI technology confronts us with a stark choice: the pursuit of relentless economic growth driven by business interests or a genuine commitment to planetary health and sustainability. As the conversation around these developments unfolds, the reality becomes increasingly clear—decisions about the future must prioritise the well-being of people and the planet over profit.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services