Analyst Anil Singhvi highlights key support and resistance levels for Nifty 50 and Bank Nifty, emphasizing a cautious yet positive outlook amid mixed global and domestic cues.
Anil Singhvi of Zee Business has set out a cautiously constructive view on the Nifty 50, placing immediate support at 23,950-24,000 and a stronger accumulation band at 23,775-23,900. He said the index could move into a higher zone at 24,125-24,240, before meeting profit-taking pressure around 24,300-24,400, while keeping the broader tone positive despite mixed positioning signals.
For Nifty Bank, Singhvi identified support at 54,625-54,875 and a deeper buy zone at 54,150-54,450. He sees upside towards 55,275-55,400 and 55,750-55,900, with a strong sell region emerging at 56,150-56,450. The strategy leaves room for both momentum traders and contrarians, with clear stop-loss levels for existing and fresh positions.
His trade setup also reflects a divided market backdrop. According to the Zee Business note, global cues were positive, domestic institutions were supportive and the overall trend remained upward, but foreign investors were still negative. The report pointed to FII long positions at 11.49 per cent, down from 12.61 per cent previously, while the Nifty put-call ratio stood at 0.98 and the Bank Nifty PCR at 0.90, suggesting a market that is not overheated but still vulnerable to swings.
The broader pattern in Singhvi’s recent calls has been one of adapting to changing index levels rather than fixing on a single bias. In later strategy updates reported by stock market tracking sites, he continued to flag separate support, buy and profit-booking bands for both Nifty 50 and Nifty Bank, underscoring that his framework is built around price zones, not predictions. His stock-specific calls on names such as Kotak Mahindra Bank, Adani Enterprises, DMart and Mazagon Dock also showed that the day’s opportunities, in his view, were likely to be selective rather than broad-based.
Source Reference Map
Inspired by headline at: [1]
Sources by paragraph:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
3
Notes:
The article references Anil Singhvi's market strategy for May 5, 2025, which is over a year old. The earliest known publication date of similar content is May 5, 2025. The narrative appears to be republished across various low-quality sites, such as Stockyfly, which may indicate recycled content. Additionally, the article includes updated data but recycles older material, raising concerns about its freshness. Given these factors, the freshness score is low.
Quotes check
Score:
2
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes attributed to Anil Singhvi. However, these quotes cannot be independently verified, as no online matches are found. This lack of verifiability raises concerns about the authenticity of the quotes. Given this, the quotes score is low.
Source reliability
Score:
2
Notes:
The primary source of the article is Stockyfly, a niche, lesser-known publication. This raises concerns about the reliability and credibility of the source. Additionally, the article appears to be summarising or aggregating content from other sources, which may affect its originality. Given these factors, the source reliability score is low.
Plausibility check
Score:
4
Notes:
The article discusses Anil Singhvi's market strategy for May 5, 2025, including specific support and resistance levels for the Nifty 50 and Nifty Bank indices. While these claims are plausible, they cannot be independently verified due to the lack of verifiable quotes and the recycled nature of the content. The absence of supporting details from other reputable outlets further diminishes the plausibility score.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The article exhibits significant issues with freshness, source reliability, and verification independence. The recycled nature of the content, lack of independently verifiable quotes, and reliance on a niche publication for both the original content and verification sources contribute to a low overall assessment. Given these concerns, the content does not meet the necessary standards for publication.