A new video created with Google’s Veo 3 AI video generator has stunned online audiences with lifelike dinosaurs and immersive scenes, showcasing the technology’s leap in realism and digital narrative capabilities amid ongoing ethical debates.
A recent video showcasing lifelike dinosaurs crafted using AI has captivated audiences online, igniting a wave of reactions and discussions surrounding the capabilities of advanced technology. The creation, made with Google's new Veo 3 video generator, immerses viewers in a vivid digital realm akin to a Jurassic Park experience. This striking visual narrative features everything from monstrous Titanosaurs to fearsome T-Rexes, with a setting that blends the charm of a fictional zoo with an extraordinary level of realism.
In the video, which has gone viral, a content creator wearing a Jurassic Park-themed hat wanders through an animated environment, where onlookers snap selfies with Velociraptors and caretakers interact with majestic prehistoric creatures. The authenticity of the scenes has led many viewers to double-take, with comments flooding in about the video’s striking resemblance to real-life experiences. One user noted, “My 12-year-old thought it was real,” while another remarked on the ferocity of the AI-generated dinosaurs, stating, “These dinosaurs look more alive than some CGI from Hollywood.”
Unveiled at Google I/O 2025, Veo 3 represents a significant leap in AI video generation, offering unprecedented capabilities that enhance the quality and intricacy of digital storytelling. Unlike earlier iterations, Veo 3 incorporates not only visuals but also dialogue, soundtracks, and sound effects, thereby allowing creators to build immersive narratives with ease. This user-friendly tool is available to Google AI Ultra subscribers for $249 per month, making cutting-edge video production accessible to a broader audience.
Despite its impressive features, Veo 3 isn’t without its challenges. Critics have raised ethical concerns regarding the implications of producing such hyper-realistic content, particularly around issues of authorship, consent, and creative integrity. Some commentators have dismissed the trend as “AI slop for National Geographic consumers,” while others argue that it heralds a new era of content creation, where even amateur creators can generate studio-quality footage with minimal input.
The technology's ability to generate high-definition videos from simple text prompts marks a transformation in the landscape of digital media. However, some limitations remain. For instance, while Veo 3 excels at creating visually stunning clips rapidly, it still grapples with interpreting complex spatial prompts and ensuring consistent audio quality across longer videos. This points to ongoing challenges that developers face as they strive for the ultimate balance between creativity and authenticity in AI-generated works.
In this evolving digital landscape, where the line between real and artificial increasingly blurs, tools like Veo 3 spark both enthusiasm and debate. As creators harness AI to push the envelope of storytelling, the potential for innovative and engaging experiences becomes boundless. Online platforms are now awash with content that invites viewers to question the nature of reality and storytelling, a trend that is likely to shape the future of entertainment in profound ways.
Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative introduces Google's Veo 3, an AI video generator unveiled at Google I/O 2025 on May 20, 2025. The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is May 23, 2025, in an Axios article titled 'Google's new AI video tool floods internet with real-looking clips'. ([axios.com](https://www.axios.com/2025/05/23/google-ai-videos-veo-3?utm_source=openai)) The report appears to be based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, the narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. Additionally, the narrative mentions a viral video showcasing lifelike dinosaurs crafted using AI, but no specific publication date is provided, making it challenging to assess its freshness. The lack of a specific date for the viral video raises concerns about the freshness of the content. The narrative also includes quotes from users commenting on the realism of the AI-generated dinosaurs, but without specific dates, it's difficult to determine if these comments are recent or recycled. The inclusion of updated data alongside older material suggests a need for further scrutiny to ensure the content's freshness.
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative includes user comments such as 'My 12-year-old thought it was real' and 'These dinosaurs look more alive than some CGI from Hollywood'. A search for the earliest known usage of these quotes reveals that similar sentiments have been expressed in earlier material, indicating potential reuse. The lack of specific dates for these quotes makes it challenging to determine their originality. The wording of the quotes varies slightly, but the underlying sentiments are consistent with earlier expressions, suggesting potential reuse. The absence of online matches for the exact wording of the quotes raises the possibility of original or exclusive content, but without verification, this remains uncertain.
Source reliability
Score:
4
Notes:
The narrative originates from BizzBuzz News, a source that is not widely recognised or verifiable. This raises concerns about the reliability of the information presented. The lack of a public presence or legitimate website for BizzBuzz News further diminishes the credibility of the report. The absence of supporting details from reputable outlets and the reliance on a single, unverifiable source contribute to the uncertainty regarding the source's reliability.
Plausability check
Score:
5
Notes:
The narrative makes claims about Google's Veo 3 AI video generator, including its capabilities and pricing. While these claims are plausible, they are not corroborated by other reputable sources, raising questions about their accuracy. The lack of supporting details from other reputable outlets and the reliance on a single, unverifiable source contribute to the uncertainty regarding the plausibility of the claims. The absence of specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, further diminishes the credibility of the report. The tone and language used in the narrative are consistent with typical corporate or official language, but the lack of supporting evidence makes it difficult to fully assess the plausibility of the claims.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents information about Google's Veo 3 AI video generator, but significant concerns about its freshness, originality, source reliability, and plausibility have been identified. The reliance on a single, unverifiable source and the lack of corroborating evidence from reputable outlets raise questions about the credibility of the content. The absence of specific dates for key events and quotes further diminishes the trustworthiness of the report. Given these issues, the overall assessment is a 'FAIL' with medium confidence.
